Assessment of brain-machine interfaces from the perspective of people with paralysis

被引:82
作者
Blabe, Christine H. [1 ]
Gilja, Vikash [1 ,2 ,3 ,5 ]
Chestek, Cindy A. [1 ,4 ]
Shenoy, Krishna V. [5 ,6 ,7 ,8 ,9 ]
Anderson, Kim D. [10 ,11 ]
Henderson, Jaimie M. [1 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Neurosurg, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
[3] Univ Calif San Diego, Neurosci Program, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
[4] Univ Michigan, Dept Biomed Engn Elect Engn & Neurosci, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[5] Stanford Univ, Dept Elect Engn, Stanford, CA 94303 USA
[6] Stanford Univ, Dept Bioengn, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[7] Stanford Univ, Stanford Neurosci Inst, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[8] Stanford Univ, Stanford BioX, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[9] Stanford Univ, Dept Neurobiol, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[10] Univ Miami, Dept Neurol Surg, Miami, FL USA
[11] Univ Miami, Miami Project Cure Paralysis, Miami, FL USA
关键词
spinal cord injury; brain-computer interface; brain-machine interface; paralysis; BCI; BMI; SPINAL-CORD-INJURY; ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY; COMPUTER INTERFACES; INDIVIDUALS; PRIORITIES; ARM;
D O I
10.1088/1741-2560/12/4/043002
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Objective. One of the main goals of brain-machine interface (BMI) research is to restore function to people with paralysis. Currently, multiple BMI design features are being investigated, based on various input modalities (externally applied and surgically implantable sensors) and output modalities (e.g. control of computer systems, prosthetic arms, and functional electrical stimulation systems). While these technologies may eventually provide some level of benefit, they each carry associated burdens for end-users. We sought to assess the attitudes of people with paralysis toward using various technologies to achieve particular benefits, given the burdens currently associated with the use of each system. Approach. We designed and distributed a technology survey to determine the level of benefit necessary for people with tetraplegia due to spinal cord injury to consider using different technologies, given the burdens currently associated with them. The survey queried user preferences for 8 BMI technologies including electroencephalography, electrocorticography, and intracortical microelectrode arrays, as well as a commercially available eye tracking system for comparison. Participants used a 5-point scale to rate their likelihood to adopt these technologies for 13 potential control capabilities. Main Results. Survey respondents were most likely to adopt BMI technology to restore some of their natural upper extremity function, including restoration of hand grasp and/or some degree of natural arm movement. High speed typing and control of a fast robot arm were also of interest to this population. Surgically implanted wireless technologies were twice as 'likely' to be adopted as their wired equivalents. Significance. Assessing end-user preferences is an essential prerequisite to the design and implementation of any assistive technology. The results of this survey suggest that people with tetraplegia would adopt an unobtrusive, autonomous BMI system for both restoration of upper extremity function and control of external devices such as communication interfaces.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Acceptable benefits and risks associated with surgically improving arm function in individuals living with cervical spinal cord injury [J].
Anderson, K. D. ;
Friden, J. ;
Lieber, R. L. .
SPINAL CORD, 2009, 47 (04) :334-338
[2]   Targeting recovery: Priorities of the spinal cord-injured population [J].
Anderson, KD .
JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA, 2004, 21 (10) :1371-1383
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1999, OUTC FOLL TRAUM SPIN
[4]  
Brown-Triolo DL, 2002, J REHABIL RES DEV, V39, P659
[5]   Continuous neuronal ensemble control of simulated arm reaching by a human with tetraplegia [J].
Chadwick, E. K. ;
Blana, D. ;
Simeral, J. D. ;
Lambrecht, J. ;
Kim, S. P. ;
Cornwell, A. S. ;
Taylor, D. M. ;
Hochberg, L. R. ;
Donoghue, J. P. ;
Kirsch, R. F. .
JOURNAL OF NEURAL ENGINEERING, 2011, 8 (03)
[6]  
Christopher and Dana Reeve Foundation, 2013, ON DEGR SEP PAR SPIN
[7]   Neuroprosthetic technology for individuals with spinal cord injury [J].
Collinger, Jennifer L. ;
Foldes, Stephen ;
Bruns, Tim M. ;
Wodlinger, Brian ;
Gaunt, Robert ;
Weber, Douglas J. .
JOURNAL OF SPINAL CORD MEDICINE, 2013, 36 (04) :258-272
[8]   Functional priorities, assistive technology, and brain-computer interfaces after spinal cord injury [J].
Collinger, Jennifer L. ;
Boninger, Michael L. ;
Bruns, Tim M. ;
Curley, Kenneth ;
Wang, Wei ;
Weber, Douglas J. .
JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2013, 50 (02) :145-159
[9]   Challenges and Opportunities for Next-Generation Intracortically Based Neural Prostheses [J].
Gilja, Vikash ;
Chestek, Cindy A. ;
Diester, Ilka ;
Henderson, Jaimie M. ;
Deisseroth, Karl ;
Shenoy, Krishna V. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2011, 58 (07) :1891-1899
[10]   Employment issues and assistive technology use for persons with spinal cord injury [J].
Hedrick, Brad ;
Pape, Theresa Louise-Bender ;
Heinemann, Allen W. ;
Ruddell, Jennifer L. ;
Reis, Janet .
JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2006, 43 (02) :185-198