A quantitative analysis of signal transduction from activin receptor to nucleus and its relevance to morphogen gradient interpretation

被引:74
作者
Shimizu, K
Gurdon, JB
机构
[1] Wellcome Canc Res Campaign Inst, Cambridge CB2 1QR, England
[2] Univ Cambridge, Dept Zool, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, England
关键词
D O I
10.1073/pnas.96.12.6791
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Previous work has shown that Xenopus blastula cells sense activin concentration by assessing the absolute number of occupied receptors per cell (100 and 300 molecules of bound activin activate Xbra and Xgsc transcription, respectively; a difference of only 3-fold). We now ask how quantitative differences in the absolute number of occupied receptors lead to the qualitatively distinct gene responses in the nucleus through SMAD2, a transducer of concentration-dependent gene responses to activin, We show that the injection of 0.2 or 0.6 ng of Smad2 mRNA activates Xbra or Xgsc transcription, respectively, involving, again, only a 3-fold difference. Furthermore,Xbra transcription is down-regulated by overexpression of SMAD2 as it is after activin signaling. We have developed a method to isolate nuclei from animal cap cells and subsequently have quantified the amount of nuclear SMAD2 protein, We find that the injection of 0.2 or 0.6 ng of Smad2 mRNA into an egg leads to only a 3-fold difference in the amount of SMAD2 protein in the nuclei of the blastula cells that express Xbra or Xgsc, We conclude that a 3-fold difference in the absolute number of occupied activin receptors can be maintained only as a 3-fold difference in the level of nuclear SMAD2 protein. Therefore, in this example of morphogen action, there appears to be no amplification of a key cytoplasmic transduction response, and a small but developmentally important change in extracellular signal concentration is relayed directly to the nucleus.
引用
收藏
页码:6791 / 6796
页数:6
相关论文
共 38 条
[21]  
KRIEG PA, 1987, METHOD ENZYMOL, V155, P397
[22]   Smad2 and Smad3 positively and negatively regulate TGFβ-dependent transcription through the forkhead DNA-Binding protein FAST2 [J].
Labbe, E ;
Silvestri, C ;
Hoodless, PA ;
Wrana, JL ;
Attisano, L .
MOLECULAR CELL, 1998, 2 (01) :109-120
[23]   Partnership between DPC4 and SMAD proteins in TGF-beta signalling pathways [J].
Lagna, G ;
Hata, A ;
HemmatiBrivanlou, A ;
Massague, J .
NATURE, 1996, 383 (6603) :832-836
[24]   Morphogens, compartments, and pattern: Lessons from Drosophila? [J].
Lawrence, PA ;
Struhl, G .
CELL, 1996, 85 (07) :951-961
[25]  
LEMAIRE P, 1994, DEVELOPMENT, V120, P1191
[26]  
LOWRY OH, 1951, J BIOL CHEM, V193, P265
[27]   Nuclear and cytoplasmic localizations of the adenomatous polyposis coli protein [J].
Neufeld, KL ;
White, RL .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1997, 94 (07) :3034-3039
[28]   Morphogens and pattern formation [J].
Neumann, C ;
Cohen, S .
BIOESSAYS, 1997, 19 (08) :721-729
[29]   A CONSERVED FAMILY OF NUCLEAR PHOSPHOPROTEINS LOCALIZED TO SITES OF POLYMERASE-II TRANSCRIPTION [J].
ROTH, MB ;
ZAHLER, AM ;
STOLK, JA .
JOURNAL OF CELL BIOLOGY, 1991, 115 (03) :587-596
[30]   Eomesodermin, a key early gene in Xenopus mesoderm differentiation [J].
Ryan, K ;
Garrett, N ;
Mitchell, A ;
Gurdon, JB .
CELL, 1996, 87 (06) :989-1000