Politics of Accommodation of the Rise of China: the case of Australia

被引:22
作者
He, Baogang [1 ]
机构
[1] Deakin Univ, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
EAST-ASIA; ENGAGEMENT; US;
D O I
10.1080/10670564.2012.627666
中图分类号
K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ;
摘要
In the context of the rise of China, Southeast Asian countries and Australia have begun shifting towards an accommodation policy. Robert Ross examines the accommodation policy in South Korea, Mochizuki discusses Japanese accommodationists, and Manicom and O'Neil show some evidence of Australian accommodation of Chinese strategic preferences. The scholarship has, however, narrowly focused on and overestimated the role of security. Through a study of the origin, process, structural conditions and impacts of accommodation policy, this paper broadens the concept of accommodation to capture its multiple meanings and practices. It finds that a selective accommodation policy and strategy toward the rise of China developed in Australia is a sign of the changing power relations under which the mainstream paradigms of containment and engagement, hard balancing or bandwagoning, have proved inadequate to the task of dealing with China, and that economic interdependence has driven the politics of accommodation in Australia and several Asian countries.
引用
收藏
页码:53 / 70
页数:18
相关论文
共 71 条
[51]  
Rudd Kevin, 2008, COMMUNICATION 0331
[52]  
Rudd Kevin, 2008, RSL NAT C 9 SEPT
[53]   East Asia and the ''constrainment'' of China [J].
Segal, G .
INTERNATIONAL SECURITY, 1996, 20 (04) :107-135
[54]   Containment or engagement of China? Calculating Beijing's responses [J].
Shambaugh, D .
INTERNATIONAL SECURITY, 1996, 21 (02) :180-209
[55]  
Sheridan Greg, 2005, WEEKEND AUSTR 0611
[56]  
Sheridan Greg, 2010, AUSTRALIAN 0320
[57]  
Sheridan Greg, 2010, AUSTRALIAN 0325
[58]  
Spears Lee, 2009, BLOOMBERG 0408
[59]  
Sutter R.G., 2005, China's rise in Asia: promises and perils
[60]   US-China relations after 11 September: a long engagement or marriage of convenience? [J].
Taylor, B .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS, 2005, 59 (02) :179-199