You can't manage right what you can't measure well: Technological innovation efficiency

被引:290
作者
Cruz-Cazares, Claudio [1 ]
Bayona-Saez, Cristina [2 ]
Garcia-Marco, Teresa [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Barcelona, Barcelona 08034, Spain
[2] Univ Publ Navarra, Pamplona 31006, Spain
关键词
Technological innovation efficiency; DEA bootstrap; Global Malmquist index; Firm performance; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE; FIRM PERFORMANCE; CROSS-COUNTRY; DEA; PRODUCTIVITY; CAPABILITIES; INDUSTRY; GROWTH; COMPETITIVENESS;
D O I
10.1016/j.respol.2013.03.012
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This paper proposes a new approach to tackle the innovation-performance relationship. It addresses the, so far, mixed and inconclusive results of studies analyzing this relationship. We argue that the undifferentiated use of innovation inputs and outputs to measure firm innovativeness is not without problems, and that, from a productive perspective, they should be simultaneously analyzed. This study follows a two-stage empirical analysis using a sample of Spanish manufacturing firms for the period 1992-2005. By examining two inputs and two outputs of the innovation process in the first stage, we estimate technological innovation efficiency by means of an intertemporal data envelopment analysis (DEA) bootstrap and also observe the yearly efficiency changes based on a global Malmquist index. In the second stage we analyze the effect of technological innovation efficiency on firm performance through a generalized method of moments (GMM) system. The results support our arguments that the best measurement of outcomes of technological innovations is through the efficiency with which they are developed. In addition, we test the moderating effect of technological intensity level and firm size on the efficiency-performance relationship. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1239 / 1250
页数:12
相关论文
共 70 条
[1]   Organizational emotional capability, product and process innovation, and firm performance: An empirical analysis [J].
Akgun, Ali E. ;
Keskin, Halit ;
Byrne, John .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2009, 26 (03) :103-130
[2]   Determinants of technical efficiency in small firms [J].
Alvarez, R ;
Crespi, G .
SMALL BUSINESS ECONOMICS, 2003, 20 (03) :233-244
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2009, EVALUATION PERFORMAN, DOI DOI 10.4337/9781849801942
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Managing Innovation
[5]   ANOTHER LOOK AT THE INSTRUMENTAL VARIABLE ESTIMATION OF ERROR-COMPONENTS MODELS [J].
ARELLANO, M ;
BOVER, O .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 1995, 68 (01) :29-51
[6]   Accounting for quality in the measurement of hospital performance:: evidence from Costa Rica [J].
Arocena, Pablo ;
Garcia-Prado, Ariadna .
HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2007, 16 (07) :667-685
[7]   Is CEO pay in high-technology firms related to innovation? [J].
Balkin, DB ;
Markman, GD ;
Gomez-Mejia, LR .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2000, 43 (06) :1118-1129
[8]   THE USE OF CATEGORICAL VARIABLES IN DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS [J].
BANKER, RD ;
MOREY, RC .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1986, 32 (12) :1613-1627
[9]  
Baum ChristopherF., 2006, INTRO MODERN ECONOME
[10]   Assessing the effectiveness of the Eureka Program [J].
Bayona-Saez, Cristina ;
Garcia-Marco, Teresa .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2010, 39 (10) :1375-1386