Retrospective clinical evaluation of gauze-based negative pressure wound therapy

被引:59
作者
Campbell, Penny E. [1 ]
Smith, Gary S. [2 ]
Smith, Jennifer M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Smith & Nephew Inc, Wound Management, Largo, FL 33773 USA
[2] Smith & Nephew Inc, Stat & Data Management Grp, Kingston Upon Hull, N Humberside, England
[3] Smith & Nephew Inc, NPWT Strateg Business Unit, Kingston Upon Hull, N Humberside, England
关键词
Gauze; Negative pressure wound therapy; Chariker-Jeter;
D O I
10.1111/j.1742-481X.2008.00485.x
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is an established modality in the treatment of challenging wounds. However, most existing clinical evidence is derived from the use of open-cell polyurethane foam at -125 mmHg. Alternative negative pressure systems are becoming available, which use gauze at a pressure of -80 mmHg. This study describes clinical results from a retrospective non comparative analysis of 30 patients treated with Chariker-Jeter gauze-based negative pressure systems (V1STA (TM), Versatile-1 (TM) and EZ-Care (TM); Smith & Nephew, Inc.) in a long-term care setting. The mean age of the patients was 72 years. The wounds consisted of chronic (n = 11), surgical dehiscence (n = 11) and surgical incision (n = 8). Wound volume and area were recorded at commencement and at the cessation of therapy. Discontinuation of therapy was instigated upon closure through secondary intention or when size and exudate were sufficiently reduced that the wounds could be managed by conventional wound dressing (median 41 days). An overall median reduction in wound volume of 88.0% (P < 0.001) and a 68.0% reduction in area (P < 0.001) compared with baseline were observed over the course of NPWT. The overall rate of volume reduction (15.1% per week) compares favourably with published data from foam-based systems.
引用
收藏
页码:280 / 286
页数:7
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   Vacuum-assisted closure: A new method for wound control and treatment: Clinical experience [J].
Argenta, LC ;
Morykwas, MJ .
ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 1997, 38 (06) :563-576
[2]   Vacuum-assisted closure: State of clinic art [J].
Argenta, Louis C. ;
Morykwas, Michael J. ;
Marks, Malcolm W. ;
DeFranzo, Anthony J. ;
Molnar, Joseph A. ;
David, Lisa R. .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2006, 117 (07) :127S-142S
[3]   Surgical wound case studies with the versatile 1 wound vacuum system for negative pressure wound therapy [J].
Campbell, PE ;
Bonham, PA .
JOURNAL OF WOUND OSTOMY AND CONTINENCE NURSING, 2006, 33 (02) :176-190
[4]  
CHARIKER M E, 1989, Contemporary Surgery, V34, P59
[5]  
Etöz A, 2004, WOUNDS, V16, P264
[6]   Interim analysis of a prospective, randomized trial of vacuum-assisted closure versus the healthpoint system in the management of pressure ulcers [J].
Ford, CN ;
Reinhard, ER ;
Yeh, D ;
Syrek, D ;
de las Morenas, A ;
Bergman, SB ;
Williams, S ;
Hamori, CA .
ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2002, 49 (01) :55-61
[7]  
Hunter Judith E, 2007, Int Wound J, V4, P256, DOI 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2007.00361.x
[8]   Negative pressure therapy is effective to manage a variety of wounds in infants and children [J].
McCord, Shannon S. ;
Naik-Mathurian, Bindi J. ;
Murphy, Kathy M. ;
McLane, Kathy M. ;
Gay, Andre N. ;
Basu, C. Bob ;
Downey, Cara R. ;
Hollier, Larry H. ;
Olutoye, Oluyinka O. .
WOUND REPAIR AND REGENERATION, 2007, 15 (03) :296-301
[9]  
Miller Michael S, 2007, Int Wound J, V4, P88, DOI 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2006.00231.x
[10]  
Miller MS, 2005, OSTOMY WOUND MANAG, V51, P44