Evaluating the credibility of transport processes in simulations of ozone recovery using the Global Modeling Initiative three-dimensional model

被引:23
作者
Strahan, SE [1 ]
Douglass, AR
机构
[1] Univ Maryland Baltimore Cty, Goddard Earth Sci & Technol Ctr, Baltimore, MD 21250 USA
[2] NASA, Goddard Space Flight Ctr, Greenbelt, MD 20771 USA
关键词
stratospheric model; process evaluation; transport;
D O I
10.1029/2003JD004238
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
[1] The Global Modeling Initiative (GMI) has integrated two 36-year simulations of an ozone recovery scenario with an offline chemistry and transport model using two different meteorological inputs. Physically based diagnostics, derived from satellite and aircraft data sets, are described and then used to evaluate the realism of temperature and transport processes in the simulations. Processes evaluated include barrier formation in the subtropics and polar regions, and extratropical wave-driven transport. Some diagnostics are especially relevant to simulation of lower stratospheric ozone, but most are applicable to any stratospheric simulation. The global temperature evaluation, which is relevant to gas phase chemical reactions, showed that both sets of meteorological fields have near climatological values at all latitudes and seasons at 30 hPa and below. Both simulations showed weakness in upper stratospheric wave driving. The simulation using input from a general circulation model (GMI(GCM)) showed a very good residual circulation in the tropics and Northern Hemisphere. The simulation with input from a data assimilation system (GMI(DAS)) performed better in the midlatitudes than it did at high latitudes. Neither simulation forms a realistic barrier at the vortex edge, leading to uncertainty in the fate of ozone-depleted vortex air. Overall, tracer transport in the offline GMI(GCM) has greater fidelity throughout the stratosphere than it does in the GMI(DAS) .
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Uncertainties and assessments of chemistry-climate models of the stratosphere [J].
Austin, J ;
Shindell, D ;
Beagley, SR ;
Brühl, C ;
Dameris, M ;
Manzini, E ;
Nagashima, T ;
Newman, P ;
Pawson, S ;
Pitari, G ;
Rozanov, E ;
Schnadt, C ;
Shepherd, TG .
ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2003, 3 :1-27
[2]   Stratospheric mean ages and transport rates from observations of carbon dioxide and nitrous oxide [J].
Boering, KA ;
Wofsy, SC ;
Daube, BC ;
Schneider, HR ;
Loewenstein, M ;
Podolske, JR .
SCIENCE, 1996, 274 (5291) :1340-1343
[3]   A polar stratospheric cloud parameterization for the global modeling initiative three-dimensional model and its response to stratospheric aircraft [J].
Considine, DB ;
Douglass, AR ;
Connell, PS ;
Kinnison, DE ;
Rotman, DA .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2000, 105 (D3) :3955-3973
[4]   Aviation fuel tracer simulation: Model intercomparison and implications [J].
Danilin, MY ;
Fahey, DW ;
Schumann, U ;
Prather, MJ ;
Penner, JE ;
Ko, MKW ;
Weisenstein, DK ;
Jackman, CH ;
Pitari, G ;
Kohler, I ;
Sausen, R ;
Weaver, CJ ;
Douglass, AR ;
Connell, PS ;
Kinnison, DE ;
Dentener, FJ ;
Fleming, EL ;
Berntsen, TK ;
Isaksen, ISA ;
Haywood, JM ;
Karcher, B .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 1998, 25 (21) :3947-3950
[5]   Choosing meteorological input for the global modeling initiative assessment of high-speed aircraft [J].
Douglass, AR ;
Prather, MJ ;
Hall, TM ;
Strahan, SE ;
Rasch, PJ ;
Sparling, LC ;
Coy, L ;
Rodriguez, JM .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1999, 104 (D22) :27545-27564
[6]   Evaluation of transport in the lower tropical stratosphere in a global chemistry and transport model [J].
Douglass, AR ;
Schoeberl, MR ;
Rood, RB ;
Pawson, S .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2003, 108 (D9)
[7]  
Gray LJ, 1999, J ATMOS SCI, V56, P977, DOI 10.1175/1520-0469(1999)056<0977:IVOTGI>2.0.CO
[8]  
2
[9]  
KINNISON DE, 2001, J GEOPHYS RES, V106, P1692
[10]  
Lin SJ, 1996, MON WEATHER REV, V124, P2046, DOI 10.1175/1520-0493(1996)124<2046:MFFSLT>2.0.CO