APPROPRIABILITY, PREEMPTION, AND FIRM PERFORMANCE

被引:177
作者
Ceccagnoli, Marco [1 ]
机构
[1] Georgia Inst Technol, Coll Management, Dept Strateg Management, Atlanta, GA 30308 USA
关键词
appropriability; patents; preemptive patenting; innovation; competitive advantage; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; STOCK MARKETS VALUATION; TECHNOLOGICAL-INNOVATION; COMPETITION; SPILLOVERS; 1ST-MOVER; INDUSTRY; ENTRY; COOPERATION; PERSISTENCE;
D O I
10.1002/smj.723
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The impact of strategies used to appropriate innovation rents on firm performance is analyzed using a sample of U.S. public manufacturing firms. Stronger appropriability at the firm level, achieved through patent protection or the ownership of specialized complementary assets, leads to superior economic performance, as measured by the stock market valuation of a firm's R&D assets. Among commonly used 'nonconventional' patent strategies, preemptive patenting allows imcumbents to strengthen their market power. Consistent with theory, such effect is higher for incumbent with higher ex ante market power and facing a higher threat of entry, and lower when R&D competition is characterized by the discovery of drastic innovations. Copyright (C) 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:81 / 98
页数:18
相关论文
共 63 条
[21]   Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R & D [J].
COHEN, WM ;
LEVINTHAL, DA .
ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 1989, 99 (397) :569-596
[22]   A reprise of size and R&D [J].
Cohen, WM ;
Klepper, S .
ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 1996, 106 (437) :925-951
[23]  
DOSI G, 1988, J ECON LIT, V26, P1120
[24]   The licensing dilemma: Understanding the determinants of the rate of technology licensing [J].
Fosfuri, Andrea .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2006, 27 (12) :1141-1158
[25]   Looking for Mr. Schumpeter: Where are we in the competition-innovation debate? [J].
Gilbert, Richard .
INNOVATION POLICY AND THE ECONOMY 6, 2006, 6 :159-215
[26]  
GILBERT RJ, 1982, AM ECON REV, V72, P514
[27]   MARKET VALUE, R-AND-D, AND PATENTS [J].
GRILICHES, Z .
ECONOMICS LETTERS, 1981, 7 (02) :183-187
[28]  
Hall B.H., 1993, BROOKINGS PAP ECO AC, V2, P289
[29]  
Hall BH, 2005, RAND J ECON, V36, P16
[30]  
HALL BH, 1993, AM ECON REV, V83, P259