Supply and demand for commodity components: implications of free trade versus the AUSFTA for the US dairy industry

被引:3
作者
Alston, Julian M. [1 ]
Balagtas, Joseph V.
Brunke, Henrich
Sumner, Daniel A.
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Agr & Resource Econ, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[2] Purdue Univ, Dept Agr Econ, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
关键词
Australia-US trade agreement; components model; dairy;
D O I
10.1111/j.1467-8489.2006.00327.x
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
During the negotiations on the Australia-US free trade agreement (AUSFTA), the US dairy industry vigorously opposed opening the US market to imports of Australian dairy products on the grounds that the US industry would be devastated. Subsequently, the agreement signed in February 2004 made an exception for dairy, providing for only limited quota expansion and no free trade, even at the end of the long implementation period. This paper presents a simulation model of world dairy markets, represented by supply and demand equations for fat and non-fat components of milk and manufactured dairy products. We use the model to analyse the effects on US milk markets of both a hypothetical agreement, allowing free bilateral trade in dairy products, and the actual AUSFTA. An important contribution to the literature is the derivation of explicit supply and demand relationships for milk components. The components model allows an analysis of long-term production, consumption, and trade patterns that is not tied to specific, fungible products. Simulations indicate that increased imports from Australia resulting from bilateral trade liberalisation would have resulted in small reductions in US milk prices and production. The much smaller increases in Australian access to the US market under the actual AUSFTA will have even smaller, almost negligible, impacts.
引用
收藏
页码:131 / 152
页数:22
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
*ACIL CONS, 2003, BRIDG TOO FAR AUSTR
[2]  
BABCOCK BA, 2003, 03SR98 IOW STAT U CT
[3]  
BABCOCK BA, 2002, 02WP317 IOW STAT U C
[4]   The effect of the northeast dairy compact on producers and consumers, with implications of compact contagion [J].
Balagtas, JV ;
Sumner, DA .
REVIEW OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2003, 25 (01) :123-144
[5]   Partial market liberalization and the efficiency of policy reform:: The case of the European dairy sector [J].
Bouamra-Mechemache, Z ;
Chavas, JP ;
Cox, TL ;
Réquillart, V .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2002, 84 (04) :1003-1020
[6]   EU dairy policy reform and future WTO negotiations:: A spatial equilibrium analysis [J].
Bouamra-Mechemache, Z ;
Chavas, JP ;
Cox, T ;
Réquillart, V .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2002, 53 (02) :233-257
[7]  
BRUNKE H, 2005, EC DATA PROJECTIONS
[8]  
Centre for International Economics (CIE), 2001, EC IMP AUSTR US FREE
[9]   Spatial allocation and the shadow pricing of product characteristics [J].
Chavas, JP ;
Cox, TL ;
Jesse, E .
AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1998, 18 (01) :1-19
[10]   AGGREGATE MILK SUPPLY RESPONSE AND INVESTMENT BEHAVIOR ON UNITED-STATES DAIRY FARMS [J].
CHAVAS, JP ;
KLEMME, RM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1986, 68 (01) :55-66