Adhesion, atomic structure, and bonding at the Al(111)/α-Al2O3(0001) interface:: A first principles study -: art. no. 085415

被引:232
作者
Siegel, DJ
Hector, LG
Adams, JB
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Phys, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
[2] ALCOA, Ctr Tech, Div Surface Sci, Alcoa Ctr, PA 15069 USA
[3] Arizona State Univ, Dept Chem & Mat Engn, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1103/PhysRevB.65.085415
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
We have performed a series of ab initio calculations to, determine the atomic structure, ideal work of adhesion (W-ad), and bonding character of the Al(111)/alpha-Al2O3(0001) interface. Six candidate interface geometries were considered, including Al an O terminations of the oxide. Minimization of the Hellman-Feynman forces resulted in substantial changes to the atomic structure of the metal near the interface, wherein some atoms adopted positions consistent with a continuation of the oxide's Al-sublattice crystal structure across the interface. Consequently, the lowest-energy structures (i.e., having the largest W-ad) are those that facilitate this "oxide extension" mechanism. By applying several methods of analysis we have thoroughly characterized the electronic structure and have determined that Al-O bonds constitute the primary interfacial bonding interaction. These bonds are very similar to the cation-anion bonds found in the oxide bulk and are mainly ionic, yet maintain a small amount of covalent character. In addition, there is evidence of metal-cation bonding at the optimal Al-terminated interface. Taking into account recent theoretical and experimental evidence suggesting an Al termination of the clean oxide surface, our calculations predict W-ad=1.36 J/m(2) [local density approximation (LDA)] and 1.06 J/m(2) [generalized gradient approximation (GGA)] for the optimal Al-terminated structure, which are in good agreement with the experimental value of 1.13 J/m(2) as scaled to 0 K. These values are approximately an order of magnitude smaller than what is found for the optimal O-terminated interface: 10.70 J/m(2) (LDA) and 9.73 J/m(2) (GGA). Although cleavage preferentially occurs at the interface for the Al termination, strong-bonding at the O-terminated interface favors cleavage within the metal.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 19
页数:19
相关论文
共 117 条
[1]   Composition and structure of the Al2O3 {0001}-(1x1) surface [J].
Ahn, J ;
Rabalais, JW .
SURFACE SCIENCE, 1997, 388 (1-3) :121-131
[2]   DOPANT EFFECT OF YTTRIUM AND THE GROWTH AND ADHERENCE OF ALUMINA ON NICKEL-ALUMINUM ALLOYS [J].
ANDERSON, AB ;
MEHANDRU, SP ;
SMIALEK, JL .
JOURNAL OF THE ELECTROCHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1985, 132 (07) :1695-1701
[3]  
Angelo JE, 1996, INTERFACE SCI, V4, P47
[4]  
[Anonymous], PHYS REV B
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1965, Mathematics of computation, DOI DOI 10.1090/S0025-5718-1965-0198670-6
[6]   DIELECTRIC CONTINUUM THEORY OF ELECTRONIC-STRUCTURE OF INTERFACES [J].
BARRERA, RG ;
DUKE, CB .
PHYSICAL REVIEW B, 1976, 13 (10) :4477-4489
[7]   First-principles calculations of the ideal cleavage energy of bulk niobium(111)/α-alumina(0001) interfaces [J].
Batirev, IG ;
Alavi, A ;
Finnis, MW ;
Deutsch, T .
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 1999, 82 (07) :1510-1513
[8]   Atomic and electronic structure and interatomic potentials at a polar ceramic/metal interface: {222}MgO/Cu [J].
Benedek, R ;
Seidman, DN ;
Minkoff, M ;
Yang, LH ;
Alavi, A .
PHYSICAL REVIEW B, 1999, 60 (23) :16094-16102
[9]   First principles simulation of a ceramic/metal interface with misfit [J].
Benedek, R ;
Alavi, A ;
Seidman, DN ;
Yang, LH ;
Muller, DA ;
Woodward, C .
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2000, 84 (15) :3362-3365
[10]   Adhesive energy and charge transfer for MgO/Cu heterophase interfaces [J].
Benedek, R ;
Minkoff, M ;
Yang, LH .
PHYSICAL REVIEW B, 1996, 54 (11) :7697-7700