Adhesion, atomic structure, and bonding at the Al(111)/α-Al2O3(0001) interface:: A first principles study -: art. no. 085415

被引:232
作者
Siegel, DJ
Hector, LG
Adams, JB
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Phys, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
[2] ALCOA, Ctr Tech, Div Surface Sci, Alcoa Ctr, PA 15069 USA
[3] Arizona State Univ, Dept Chem & Mat Engn, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1103/PhysRevB.65.085415
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
We have performed a series of ab initio calculations to, determine the atomic structure, ideal work of adhesion (W-ad), and bonding character of the Al(111)/alpha-Al2O3(0001) interface. Six candidate interface geometries were considered, including Al an O terminations of the oxide. Minimization of the Hellman-Feynman forces resulted in substantial changes to the atomic structure of the metal near the interface, wherein some atoms adopted positions consistent with a continuation of the oxide's Al-sublattice crystal structure across the interface. Consequently, the lowest-energy structures (i.e., having the largest W-ad) are those that facilitate this "oxide extension" mechanism. By applying several methods of analysis we have thoroughly characterized the electronic structure and have determined that Al-O bonds constitute the primary interfacial bonding interaction. These bonds are very similar to the cation-anion bonds found in the oxide bulk and are mainly ionic, yet maintain a small amount of covalent character. In addition, there is evidence of metal-cation bonding at the optimal Al-terminated interface. Taking into account recent theoretical and experimental evidence suggesting an Al termination of the clean oxide surface, our calculations predict W-ad=1.36 J/m(2) [local density approximation (LDA)] and 1.06 J/m(2) [generalized gradient approximation (GGA)] for the optimal Al-terminated structure, which are in good agreement with the experimental value of 1.13 J/m(2) as scaled to 0 K. These values are approximately an order of magnitude smaller than what is found for the optimal O-terminated interface: 10.70 J/m(2) (LDA) and 9.73 J/m(2) (GGA). Although cleavage preferentially occurs at the interface for the Al termination, strong-bonding at the O-terminated interface favors cleavage within the metal.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 19
页数:19
相关论文
共 117 条
[51]   EFFICACIOUS FORM FOR MODEL PSEUDOPOTENTIALS [J].
KLEINMAN, L ;
BYLANDER, DM .
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 1982, 48 (20) :1425-1428
[52]   SELF-CONSISTENT EQUATIONS INCLUDING EXCHANGE AND CORRELATION EFFECTS [J].
KOHN, W ;
SHAM, LJ .
PHYSICAL REVIEW, 1965, 140 (4A) :1133-&
[53]   Ab initio calculations for SiC-Al interfaces: Tests of electronic-minimization techniques [J].
Kohyama, M .
MODELLING AND SIMULATION IN MATERIALS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 1996, 4 (04) :397-408
[54]   Ab initio calculations of the β-SiC(001)/Ti interface [J].
Kohyama, M ;
Hoekstra, J .
PHYSICAL REVIEW B, 2000, 61 (04) :2672-2679
[55]  
Kostlmeier S, 1998, MATER RES SOC SYMP P, V492, P97
[56]   Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set [J].
Kresse, G ;
Furthmuller, J .
PHYSICAL REVIEW B, 1996, 54 (16) :11169-11186
[57]   NORM-CONSERVING AND ULTRASOFT PSEUDOPOTENTIALS FOR FIRST-ROW AND TRANSITION-ELEMENTS [J].
KRESSE, G ;
HAFNER, J .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICS-CONDENSED MATTER, 1994, 6 (40) :8245-8257
[58]  
LAMPARTER P, 1997, PHYSICA B, V405, P234
[59]   WETTABILITY OF MONOCRYSTALLINE ALUMINA BY ALUMINUM BETWEEN ITS MELTING-POINT AND 1273-K [J].
LAURENT, V ;
CHATAIN, D ;
CHATILLON, C ;
EUSTATHOPOULOS, N .
ACTA METALLURGICA, 1988, 36 (07) :1797-1803
[60]   WETTING AND INTERFACIAL BONDING OF METALS WITH IONOCOVALENT OXIDES [J].
LI, JG .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CERAMIC SOCIETY, 1992, 75 (11) :3118-3126