Confidence bounds when the estimated ROC area is 1.0

被引:12
作者
Obuchowski, NA
Lieber, ML
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Dept Biostat & Epidemiol, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[2] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Dept Radiol, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
关键词
receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) statistical analysis;
D O I
10.1016/S1076-6332(03)80329-X
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Rationale and Objectives. In studies with small samples, the authors often encounter data sets in which the estimated area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve is 1.0. In such cases, neither asymptotic nor resampling methods provide a means of estimating the standard error or constructing a lower confidence bound. The purpose of this study was to develop tables for determining the approximate 95% lower confidence bound when the estimated ROC area is 1.0. Materials and Methods. Using Monte Carlo simulation. the authors generated 10.000 data sets for each specification of sample sizes, ROC curve shape. and data format (continuous and ordinal scale). For each of these combinations the authors determined the 95% lower confidence bound. Results. When the estimated ROC area is 1.0, the 95% lower confidence bounds differ dramatically depending on the shape of the ROC curve and on whether the test results are ordinal or continuous. Four tables of 95% lower confidence bounds are provided, along with guidelines for their use. Conclusion. Given the different shapes of ROC curves and the different formats in which ROC data are collected, it is not feasible to offer one simple method of constructing confidence bounds that works for all ROC curves. The tables provided in this article are useful for interpreting studies with estimated ROC areas of 1.0.
引用
收藏
页码:526 / 530
页数:5
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
Carlin B. P., 2001, BAYES EMPIRICAL BAYE
[2]   COMPARING THE AREAS UNDER 2 OR MORE CORRELATED RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVES - A NONPARAMETRIC APPROACH [J].
DELONG, ER ;
DELONG, DM ;
CLARKEPEARSON, DI .
BIOMETRICS, 1988, 44 (03) :837-845
[3]   MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION OF PARAMETERS OF SIGNAL-DETECTION THEORY AND DETERMINATION OF CONFIDENCE INTERVALS - RATING-METHOD DATA [J].
DORFMAN, DD ;
ALF, E .
JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1969, 6 (03) :487-&
[4]   DEGENERACY AND DISCRETE RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC RATING DATA [J].
DORFMAN, DD ;
BERBAUM, KS .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 1995, 2 (10) :907-915
[5]   Proper receiver operating characteristic analysis: The bigamma model [J].
Dorfman, DD ;
Berbaum, KS ;
Metz, CE ;
Lenth, RV ;
Hanley, JA ;
AbuDagga, H .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 1997, 4 (02) :138-149
[6]   MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION OF PARAMETERS OF SIGNAL DETECTION THEORY - A DIRECT SOLUTION [J].
DORFMAN, DD ;
ALF, E .
PSYCHOMETRIKA, 1968, 33 (01) :117-&
[7]   A contaminated binormal model for ROC data - Part I. Some interesting examples of binormal degeneracy [J].
Dorfman, DD ;
Berbaum, KS ;
Brandser, EA .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2000, 7 (06) :420-426
[8]   A contaminated binormal model for ROC data - Part III. Initial evaluation with detection ROC data [J].
Dorfman, DD ;
Berbaum, KS .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2000, 7 (06) :438-447
[9]   A contaminated binormal model for ROC data - Part II. A formal model [J].
Dorfman, DD ;
Berbaum, KS .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2000, 7 (06) :427-437
[10]   Monte Carlo validation of a multireader method for receiver operating characteristic discrete rating data: Split plot experimental design [J].
Dorfman, DD ;
Berbaum, KS ;
Lenth, RV ;
Chen, YF .
MEDICAL IMAGING 1999: IMAGE PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1999, 3663 :91-99