Towards an improved understanding of project stakeholder landscapes

被引:77
作者
Aaltonen, Kirsi [1 ]
Kujala, Jaakko [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oulu, Ind Engn & Management, POB 4610, FIN-90014 Oulu, Finland
关键词
Project stakeholder landscapes; Stakeholder management; Stakeholder theory; Complexity; Uncertainty; Dynamism; Institutional context; INTERNAL STAKEHOLDERS; CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS; PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT; COMPLEXITY; STRATEGIES; FRAMEWORK; SYSTEMS; PERSPECTIVE; GOVERNANCE; LEGITIMACY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.08.009
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Understanding stakeholders, their influences and devising engagement strategies based on the analyses of stakeholder landscapes has become one of the key capabilities within project-based firms. Based on a systematic literature review of the project stakeholder management literature, we develop a conceptual framework for characterizing and classifying project stakeholder landscapes. The framework synthesizes four key dimensions of project stakeholder landscapes and their various sub-factors: complexity (element and relationship complexity), uncertainty, dynamism and the institutional context. The developed framework will provide both academics and practitioners with a shared language to make sense of what types of stakeholder landscapes exist, to categorize projects based on their stakeholder environments and to start evaluating what types of implications different types of landscapes have on stakeholder management and project management in general. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. APM and IPMA. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1537 / 1552
页数:16
相关论文
共 115 条
[81]   Dimensions of distance in a project network: Exploring Olkiluoto 3 nuclear power plant project [J].
Ruuska, Inkeri ;
Artto, Karlos ;
Aaltonen, Kirsi ;
Lehtonen, Paivi .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2009, 27 (02) :142-153
[82]   How actor-network theories can help in understanding project complexities [J].
Sage, Daniel ;
Dainty, Andrew ;
Brookes, Naomi .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGING PROJECTS IN BUSINESS, 2011, 4 (02) :274-293
[83]   How governmental stakeholders influence large projects: the case of nuclear power plant projects [J].
Sallinen, Liisa ;
Ruuska, Inkeri ;
Ahola, Tuomas .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGING PROJECTS IN BUSINESS, 2013, 6 (01) :51-+
[84]   Governmental Stakeholder and Project Owner's Views on the Regulative Framework in Nuclear Projects [J].
Sallinen, Liisa ;
Ahola, Tuomas ;
Ruuska, Inkeri .
PROJECT MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2011, 42 (06) :33-47
[85]  
SAVAGE Grant., 1991, ACAD MANAGE EXEC, V5, P61, DOI [10.5465/ame.1991.4274682, DOI 10.2307/4165008]
[86]   Institutions and Organizations. Ideas, Interests and Identities [J].
Scott, W. Richard .
MANAGEMENT, 2014, 17 (02) :136-140
[87]  
Shenhar A.J., 2007, REINVENTING PROJECT
[88]   One size does not fit all projects: Exploring classical contingency domains [J].
Shenhar, AJ .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2001, 47 (03) :394-414
[89]   Toward a typological theory of project management [J].
Shenhar, AJ ;
Dvir, D .
RESEARCH POLICY, 1996, 25 (04) :607-632
[90]   Governance of Public Investment Projects in Ethiopia [J].
Shiferaw, Asmamaw Tadege ;
Klakegg, Ole Jonny ;
Haavaldsen, Tore .
PROJECT MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2012, 43 (04) :52-69