A scanning electron microscopic study of debris and smear layer remaining following use of GT rotary instruments

被引:48
作者
Gambarini, G
Laszkiewicz, J
机构
[1] Med Univ, Inst Dent, Dept Conservat Dent, PL-92213 Lodz, Poland
[2] Univ Rome, Dept Periodont Endodont, Rome, Italy
关键词
canal debridement; rotary files; scanning electron microscopy;
D O I
10.1046/j.1365-2591.2002.00495.x
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Aim The aim of the present study was to assess debris and smear layer remaining following canal preparation with GT rotary instruments. Methodolgy Sixteen freshly extracted single-rooted premolar teeth were instrumented with GT(TM) rotary instruments using a crown-down preparation technique. All specimens were flushed with 2 mL of 5% NaOCl between each rotary instrument. At the end of instrumentation the following final irrigation sequence was repeated two times: 2 mL of EDTA + Cetrimide for 1 min (Largal Ultra, Septodont, France) and 2 mL of 5% NaOCl for 5 min. A final flush with saline solution was made to halt any chemical activity. Two other uninstrumented teeth that were not irrigated served as controls. All teeth were split longitudinally and prepared for SEM evaluation. The presence of debris and smear layer was evaluated from photomicrographs at x200 and x1000 magnification taken in the apical, middle and coronal thirds of the canals. Blind evaluation was performed by two trained observers and scores were compiled separately. A five category scoring system for debris and smear layer was used. Values obtained were tabulated and statistical analysis was carried out using a parametric chi-squared test. Results Statistical analysis showed that there was no significant difference between the three regions of the root canals (P > 0.05) for debris. Comparison of the removal of the smear layer between the three regions showed that there was a statistically significant difference between all parts, especially between the coronal and apical thirds (P < 0.001). Overall, the coronal sections were cleaner than the middle and apical sections. The uninstrumented canals showed walls completely covered with tissue, confirming that specimen preparation alone did not remove tissue. Conclusions Under the conditions of the present study GT(TM) rotary instruments removed debris effectively, but left root canal walls covered with smear layer, particularly in the apical third.
引用
收藏
页码:422 / 427
页数:6
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   THE PENETRATION OF SMEAR MATERIAL INTO DENTINAL TUBULES DURING INSTRUMENTATION WITH SURFACE-ACTIVE REAGENTS - A SCANNING ELECTRON-MICROSCOPIC STUDY [J].
AKTENER, BO ;
CENGIZ, T ;
PISKIN, B .
JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 1989, 15 (12) :588-590
[2]  
BAUMGARTNER JC, 1987, J ENDODONT, V13, P147
[3]   Scanning electron microscope study on the efficacy of root canal wall debridement of hand versus Lightspeed instrumentation [J].
Bechelli, C ;
Orlandini, SZ ;
Colafranceschi, M .
INTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNAL, 1999, 32 (06) :484-493
[4]   The removal of the smear layer using the Quantec system.: A study using the scanning electron microscope [J].
Bertrand, MF ;
Pizzardini, P ;
Muller, M ;
Médioni, E ;
Rocca, JP .
INTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNAL, 1999, 32 (03) :217-224
[5]  
Bolanos OR, 1988, J ENDODONT, V8, P392
[6]   A COMPARISON OF CANAL PREPARATION WITH NICKEL-TITANIUM AND STAINLESS-STEEL INSTRUMENTS [J].
ESPOSITO, PT ;
CUNNINGHAM, CJ .
JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 1995, 21 (04) :173-176
[7]   Shaping and cleaning the root canal system: A scanning electron microscopic evaluation of a new instrumentation and irrigation technique [J].
Gambarini, G .
JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 1999, 25 (12) :800-803
[8]   A COMPARISON OF ROOT-CANAL PREPARATIONS USING NI-TI HAND, NI-TI ENGINE-DRIVEN, AND K-FLEX ENDODONTIC INSTRUMENTS [J].
GLOSSON, CR ;
HALLER, RH ;
DOVE, SB ;
DELRIO, CE .
JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 1995, 21 (03) :146-151
[9]   COMPARISON OF ROOT-CANAL PREPARATION USING DIFFERENT AUTOMATED DEVICES AND HAND INSTRUMENTATION [J].
HULSMANN, M ;
STRYGA, F .
JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 1993, 19 (03) :141-145
[10]   Root canal cleanliness after preparation with different endodontic handpieces and hand instruments: A comparative SEM investigation [J].
Hulsmann, M ;
Rummelin, C ;
Schafers, F .
JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 1997, 23 (05) :301-306