Bowel magnetic resonance imaging of pediatric patients with oral mannitol - MRI compared to endoscopy and intestinal ultrasound

被引:52
作者
Borthne, AS
Abdelnoor, M
Rugtveit, J
Perminow, G
Reiseter, T
Klow, NE
机构
[1] Ulleval Hosp, Dept Pediat Radiol, N-0407 Oslo, Norway
[2] Ulleval Hosp, Clin Res Ctr, Epidemiol & Biostat Sect, N-0407 Oslo, Norway
[3] Ulleval Hosp, Dept Pediat Gastroenterol, N-0407 Oslo, Norway
[4] Ulleval Hosp, Dept Cardiovasc Radiol, N-0407 Oslo, Norway
关键词
diagnostic; magnetic resonance imaging; ultrasound; endoscopy; small bowel;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-005-2793-y
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to assess the sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in pediatric patients with clinical suspicion of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) by comparing MRI and ultrasound (US) to endoscopy, the gold standard. A median volume of 300 ml of mannitol in a 4.5% watery solution were ingested by 43 children prior to examination. The 53 MRI examinations were compared with 20 endoscopies and 41 US of the terminal ileum. The outcomes were MRI quality; pathologic findings; level of adverse events; and concordance between endoscopy, MRI, and US estimated by kappa statistics. The ileum and terminal ileum were very good or excellently imaged in approximately 80% of cases. Wall thickening and enhancement were most frequent in the terminal ileum. MRI compared with endoscopy had a sensitivity of 81.8% [95% confidence interval (CI)], specificity of 100%, diagnostic accuracy of 90%, and kappa value of 0.80 (95% CI), indicating a good degree of concordance. A similar degree of concordance was achieved between US and endoscopy. In spite of the frequent adverse reactions, such as diarrhea and nausea, half of the patients were prepared to repeat the examination. The results of MRI are concordant with endoscopy and US of the terminal ileum.
引用
收藏
页码:207 / 214
页数:8
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Oral contrast agents for small bowel MRI: comparison of different additives to optimize bowel distension [J].
Ajaj, W ;
Goehde, SC ;
Schneemann, H ;
Ruehm, SG ;
Debatin, JF ;
Lauenstein, TC .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2004, 14 (03) :458-464
[2]  
ALTMAN DG, 1996, PRACTICAL STAT MED R, P404
[3]  
BIGARD MA, 1979, GASTROENTEROLOGY, V77, P1307
[4]   MR imaging of the small bowel with increasing concentrations of an oral osmotic agent [J].
Borthne, AS ;
Abdelnoor, M ;
Hellund, JC ;
Geitung, JT ;
Storaas, T ;
Gjesdal, KI ;
Klow, NE .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2005, 15 (04) :666-671
[5]   Bowel MR imaging with oral Gastrografin: an experimental study with healthy volunteers [J].
Borthne, AS ;
Dormagen, JB ;
Gjesdal, KI ;
Storaas, T ;
Lygren, I ;
Geitung, JT .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2003, 13 (01) :100-106
[6]   Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging - A useful radiological tool in diagnosing pediatric IBD [J].
Darbari, A ;
Sena, L ;
Argani, P ;
Oliva-Hemker, M ;
Thompson, R ;
Cuffari, C .
INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASES, 2004, 10 (02) :67-72
[7]  
Fletcher MA, 1996, J ENDOTOXIN RES, V3, P49, DOI 10.1177/096805199600300106
[8]   Indeterminate colitis [J].
Geboes, K ;
De Hertogh, G .
INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASES, 2003, 9 (05) :324-331
[9]   MR imaging of the small bowel with a true-FISP sequence after enteroclysis with water solution [J].
Gourtsoyiannis, N ;
Papanikolaou, N ;
Grammatikakis, J ;
Maris, T ;
Prassopoulos, P .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2000, 35 (12) :707-711
[10]   Radiographic examination of the small bowel: Survey of practice patterns in the United States [J].
Ha, AS ;
Levine, MS ;
Rubesin, SE ;
Laufer, I ;
Herlinger, H .
RADIOLOGY, 2004, 231 (02) :407-412