Risk assessment in determining systemic reactivity to honeybee stings in beekeepers

被引:18
作者
Annila, IT
Annila, PA
Morsky, P
机构
[1] TAMPERE UNIV HOSP,DEPT CLIN CHEM,FIN-33521 TAMPERE,FINLAND
[2] TAMPERE UNIV,SCH MED,FIN-33101 TAMPERE,FINLAND
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S1081-1206(10)63234-6
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background: The use of laboratory tests as a reliable method for risk assessment in determining the systemic reactivity of beekeepers to honeybee stings has proven unsatisfactory. Objective: This study was conducted to evaluate the usefulness of a structured questionnaire as a supplement to bee venom-specific IgE data in the prediction of systemic sting reactions of 78 beekeepers to honeybee stings. Methods: Participants in previous studies completed a questionnaire concerning potential risk factors of systemic sting reactions. Serum bee venom IgE was measured by CAP-RAST. Skin prick tests were performed with standardized bee venom extracts prior to the beekeeping season. Venom challenges were performed using unintentional field stings, A new questionnaire concerning sting reactions during the recent beekeeping season was sent to the beekeepers after it had ended. A multiple logistic regression analysis was done to evaluate the influence of potential risk factors upon systemic bee sting reactions. Results: Four variables were significant, The pre-season presence of serum bee venom-specific IgE at concentrations exceeding 1.0 kU/L increased the risk of systemic reactions 12-fold. The risk was 10-fold if nasal or respiratory symptoms had occurred while working at hives, When the years spent in beekeeping were fewer than eight the risk of systemic sting reaction was 9-fold, any previous systemic reaction increased the risk 8-fold. Conclusion: The use of more detailed patient histories in combination with laboratory tests may markedly improve the reliability of risk assessment.
引用
收藏
页码:473 / 477
页数:5
相关论文
共 39 条
[11]   LACK OF REPRODUCIBILITY OF A SINGLE NEGATIVE STING CHALLENGE RESPONSE IN THE ASSESSMENT OF ANAPHYLACTIC RISK IN PATIENTS WITH SUSPECTED YELLOW JACKET HYPERSENSITIVITY [J].
FRANKEN, HH ;
DUBOIS, AEJ ;
MINKEMA, HJ ;
VANDERHEIDE, S ;
DEMONCHY, JGR .
JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 1994, 93 (02) :431-436
[12]  
GENTLESK MJ, 1987, ANN ALLERGY, V59, P267
[13]  
GOLDBERG A, 1995, ANN ALLERG ASTHMA IM, V75, P30
[14]   EPIDEMIOLOGY OF INSECT VENOM SENSITIVITY [J].
GOLDEN, DBK ;
MARSH, DG ;
KAGEYSOBOTKA, A ;
FREIDHOFF, L ;
SZKLO, M ;
VALENTINE, MD ;
LICHTENSTEIN, LM .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1989, 262 (02) :240-244
[15]   CLINICAL AND IMMUNOLOGICAL FEATURES AND SUBSEQUENT COURSE OF PATIENTS WITH SEVERE INSECT-STING ANAPHYLAXIS [J].
LANTNER, R ;
REISMAN, RE .
JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 1989, 84 (06) :900-906
[16]  
LIGHT W C, 1975, Clinical Allergy, V5, P389, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2222.1975.tb01878.x
[17]  
LIGHT WC, 1976, CLIN ALLERGY, V6, P292
[18]   COMPARISON OF THE ATOPIC BACKGROUND BETWEEN ALLERGIC AND NONALLERGIC BEEKEEPERS [J].
MIYACHI, S ;
LESSOF, MH ;
KEMENY, DM ;
GREEN, LA .
INTERNATIONAL ARCHIVES OF ALLERGY AND APPLIED IMMUNOLOGY, 1979, 58 (02) :160-166
[19]   INSECT ALLERGY - PREDICTIVE VALUE OF DIAGNOSTIC-TESTS - A 3-YEAR FOLLOW-UP-STUDY [J].
MOSBECH, H ;
CHRISTENSEN, J ;
DIRKSEN, A ;
SOBORG, M .
CLINICAL ALLERGY, 1986, 16 (05) :433-440
[20]  
MULLER HL, 1966, J ASTHMA RES, V3, P331