Once-daily intravenous cefazolin plus oral probenecid is equivalent to once-daily intravenous ceftriaxone plus oral placebo for the treatment of moderate-to-severe cellulitis in adults

被引:54
作者
Grayson, ML
McDonald, M
Gibson, K
Athan, E
Munckhof, WJ
Paull, P
Chambers, F
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Infect Dis & Clin Epidemiol Dept, Melbourne, Vic 3004, Australia
[2] Monash Univ, Monash Med Ctr, Hosp Home Unit, Melbourne, Vic 3004, Australia
[3] Monash Univ, St Vincents Hosp, Dept Clin Biochem, Melbourne, Vic 3004, Australia
[4] Monash Univ, Dept Epidemiol & Prevent Med, Dept Clin Biochem, Melbourne, Vic 3004, Australia
[5] Geelong Hosp, Hosp Home Unit, Geelong, Vic, Australia
[6] Geelong Hosp, Dept Infect Dis, Geelong, Vic, Australia
[7] Princess Alexandria & Dist Hlth Serv, Infect Management Serv, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.1086/340056
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
A once-daily regimen of cefazolin (2 g intravenously [iv]) plus probenecid (1 g by mouth) was compared with a once-daily regimen of ceftriaxone (1 g iv) plus oral placebo in a randomized, double-blind equivalence trial of home-based therapy for moderate-to-severe cellulitis in adults. For the assessable recipients of cefazolin-probenecid (n = 59) and ceftriaxone-placebo (n = 57), clinical cure occurred at the end of treatment in 86% and 96% (P = .11), respectively, and was maintained at 1 month of follow-up in 96% and 91% respectively. The mean number of treatment doses ( standard deviation) given was similar in the 2 treatment arms (6.97 +/- 2.6 for cefazolin-probenecid and 6.12 +/- 2,1 for ceftriaxone-placebo; P = .06). The median antibiotic trough concentrations were 2.35 mug/mL for cefazolin and 15.45 mug/mL for ceftriaxone. Patients in the 2 treatment arms were similar with regard to overall rates of adverse reaction (P = .15), but nausea was more common among those in the cefazolin-probenecid arm (P = .048). The once-daily regimen of cefazolin-probenecid is a cheap, practical, and effective treatment option for moderate-to-severe cellulitis, and it avoids the need to use third-generation cephalosporins in most patients.
引用
收藏
页码:1440 / 1448
页数:9
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of outpatient intravenous antimicrobial therapy [J].
Andes, D ;
Craig, WA .
INFECTIOUS DISEASE CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 1998, 12 (04) :849-+
[2]  
BRADSHER RW, 1984, AM J MED, V77, P63
[3]   EFFECT OF PROBENECID ON CEFAZOLIN SERUM CONCENTRATIONS [J].
BROWN, G ;
ZEMCOV, SJV ;
CLARKE, AM .
JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 1993, 31 (06) :1009-1011
[4]  
Brown Glen, 1996, Journal of Emergency Medicine, V14, P547, DOI 10.1016/S0736-4679(96)00126-6
[5]   RANDOMIZED COMPARISON TRIAL OF TEICOPLANIN-IV, TEICOPLANIN-IM, AND CEFAZOLIN THERAPY FOR SKIN AND SOFT-TISSUE INFECTIONS CAUSED BY GRAM-POSITIVE BACTERIA [J].
CHIRURGI, VA ;
EDELSTEIN, H ;
OSTER, SE ;
KARP, R ;
CASSANO, KB ;
AIKEN, S ;
MCCABE, RE .
SOUTHERN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1994, 87 (09) :875-880
[6]   Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters: Rationale for antibacterial dosing of mice and men [J].
Craig, WA .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1998, 26 (01) :1-10
[7]   POSTANTIBIOTIC EFFECTS IN EXPERIMENTAL-INFECTION MODELS - RELATIONSHIP TO INVITRO PHENOMENA AND TO TREATMENT OF INFECTIONS IN MAN [J].
CRAIG, WA .
JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 1993, 31 :149-158
[9]   CEFTRIAXONE THERAPY OF BONE AND SOFT-TISSUE INFECTIONS IN HOSPITAL AND OUTPATIENT SETTINGS [J].
ERON, LJ ;
PARK, CH ;
HIXON, DL ;
GOLDENBERG, RI ;
PORETZ, DM .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 1983, 23 (05) :731-737
[10]  
Gerber A U, 1990, Scand J Infect Dis Suppl, V74, P147