Influx and efflux transport of H1-antagonist epinastine across the blood-brain barrier

被引:23
作者
Ishiguro, N
Nozawa, T
Tsujihata, A
Saito, A
Kishimoto, W
Yokoyama, K
Yotsumoto, T
Sakai, K
Igarashi, T
Tamai, I
机构
[1] Tokyo Univ Sci, Fac Pharmaceut Sci, Chiba 2788510, Japan
[2] Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co Ltd, Kawanishi Pharma Res Inst, Dept Drug Metab & Pharmacokinet, Hyogo, Japan
[3] Japan Sci & Technol Cooperat, CREST, Kawaguchi, Japan
关键词
D O I
10.1124/dmd.32.5.519
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
We investigated influx and efflux transporters involved in blood-brain barrier transport of the nonsedative H1-antagonist epinastine. The basal-to-apical transport of [C-14] epinastine was markedly higher than that in the opposite direction in LLC-GA5-COL150 cells stably transfected with human multidrug resistance (MDR) 1 gene. The brain-to-plasma concentration ratio of [C-14] epinastine in mdr1a/b(-/-) mice was 3.2 times higher than that in wild-type mice. The uptake of both [H-3] mepyramine and [C-14] epinastine into immortalized rat brain capillary endothelial cells ( RBEC) 1 showed temperature and concentration dependence. The kinetic parameters, K-m, V-max, and uptake clearance (V-max/K-m), of the initial uptake of [H-3] mepyramine and [C-14] epinastine by RBEC1 were 150 muM, 41.8 nmol/min/mg protein, and 279 mul/min/mg protein for mepyramine and 10.0 mM, 339 nmol/min/mg protein, and 33.9 mul/min/mg protein for epinastine, respectively. The uptake of [H-3] mepyramine and [C-14] epinastine by RBEC1 was inhibited by organic cations such as quinidine, amantadine, and verapamil, but not by other organic cations, tetraethyl ammonium, guanidine, and carnitine. Organic anions such as benzoic acid, estrone-3-sulfate, taurocholate, and neutral digoxin were not inhibitory. Furthermore, some cationic H1 antagonists (chlorpheniramine, cyproheptadine, ketotifen, and desloratadine) inhibited the [H-3] mepyramine and [C-14] epinastine uptake into RBEC1. In conclusion, the present study demonstrated that the combination of efficient efflux transport by P-glycoprotein and poor uptake by the influx transporter, which is identical with that responsible for the uptake of mepyramine, account for the low brain distribution of epinastine.
引用
收藏
页码:519 / 524
页数:6
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   ANTIHISTAMINE ACTIVITY AND CENTRAL EFFECTS OF WAL 801 CL IN MAN [J].
ADAMUS, WS ;
OLDIGSKERBER, J ;
LOHMANN, HF .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1987, 33 (04) :381-385
[2]   Blood-brain barrier is involved in the efflux transport of a neuroactive steroid, dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate, via organic anion transporting polypeptide 2 [J].
Asaba, H ;
Hosoya, K ;
Takanaga, H ;
Ohtsuki, S ;
Tamura, E ;
Takizawa, T ;
Terasaki, T .
JOURNAL OF NEUROCHEMISTRY, 2000, 75 (05) :1907-1916
[3]  
Cheng ML, 2001, FREE RADICAL BIO MED, V31, pS104
[4]   Affinity for the P-glycoprotein efflux pump at the blood-brain barrier may explain the lack of CNS side-effects of modern antihistamines [J].
Chishty, M ;
Reichel, A ;
Siva, J ;
Abbott, NJ ;
Begley, DJ .
JOURNAL OF DRUG TARGETING, 2001, 9 (03) :223-228
[5]  
Cvetkovic M, 1999, DRUG METAB DISPOS, V27, P866
[6]   The cation transporters rOCT1 and rOCT2 interact with bicarbonate but play only a minor role for amantadine uptake into rat renal proximal tubules [J].
Goralski, KB ;
Lou, GL ;
Prowse, MT ;
Gorboulev, V ;
Volk, C ;
Koepsell, H ;
Sitar, DS .
JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY AND EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS, 2002, 303 (03) :959-968
[7]  
Han YH, 2001, J PHARMACOL EXP THER, V296, P450
[8]  
Kato M, 1997, ARZNEIMITTELFORSCH, V47, P1116
[9]   Functional clarification of MCT1-mediated transport of monocarboxylic acids at the blood-brain barrier using in vitro cultured cells and in vivo BUI studies [J].
Kido, Y ;
Tamai, I ;
Okamoto, M ;
Suzuki, F ;
Tsuji, A .
PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH, 2000, 17 (01) :55-62
[10]   Molecular and functional identification of large neutral amino acid transporters LAT1 and LAT2 and their pharmacological relevance at the blood-brain barrier [J].
Kido, Y ;
Tamai, I ;
Uchino, H ;
Suzuki, F ;
Sai, Y ;
Tsuji, A .
JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2001, 53 (04) :497-503