Affinity for the P-glycoprotein efflux pump at the blood-brain barrier may explain the lack of CNS side-effects of modern antihistamines

被引:61
作者
Chishty, M [1 ]
Reichel, A [1 ]
Siva, J [1 ]
Abbott, NJ [1 ]
Begley, DJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Kings Coll London, GKT Sch Biomed Sci, Ctr Res Neurosci, Blood Brain Barrier Res Grp, London SE1 1UL, England
关键词
antihistamine; blood-brain barrier; CNS side-effects; P-glycoprotein; sedation; RBE4;
D O I
10.3109/10611860108997930
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
First generation Hl receptor antagonists are often associated with adverse CNS effects such as sedation, whereas modem, second generation antihistamines are generally non-sedating. The difference in therapeutic profile is mainly due to the poor CNS penetration of the modem derivatives. Current explanations for the differential ability of classical and modem antihistamines to cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB), based on differences in lipophilicity or protein binding, are inadequate. We have tested the hypothesis that non-sedating antihistamines fail to enter the CNS due to recognition by the P-glycoprotein (Pgp) drug efflux pump expressed on the luminal surface of cerebral endothelial cells forming the BBB in vivo. The ability of several sedating and non-sedating antihistamines to affect the uptake of the Pgp model substrate [H-3]-colchicine was examined using the immortalised rat brain endothelial cell line, RBE4, an established in vitro model of the BBB expressing Pq. All second generation antihistamines tested, significantly increased net accumulation of [H-3]-colchicine to a level similar to that caused by the Pgp inhibitor verapamil. By contrast, the first generation antihistamines showed no affinity for Pgp. The results indicate that differences in the ability of classical and modem antihistamines to interact with Pgp at the BBB may determine their CNS penetration and as a consequence the presence or absence of central side-effects.
引用
收藏
页码:223 / 228
页数:6
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
Begley DJ, 1996, J NEUROCHEM, V67, P988
[2]   THE BLOOD-BRAIN-BARRIER [J].
BRADBURY, MWB .
EXPERIMENTAL PHYSIOLOGY, 1993, 78 (04) :453-472
[3]  
Emanuel MB, 1999, CLIN EXP ALLERGY, V29, P1
[4]   H-1-RECEPTOR ANTAGONISTS - COMPARATIVE TOLERABILITY AND SAFETY [J].
ESTELLE, F ;
SIMONS, R .
DRUG SAFETY, 1994, 10 (05) :350-380
[5]   Mechanism of action of p-glycoprotein in relation to passive membrane permeation [J].
Eytan, GD ;
Kuchel, PW .
INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF CYTOLOGY - A SURVEY OF CELL BIOLOGY, VOL 190, 1999, 190 :175-250
[6]   TERFENADINE (SELDANE(R)) - A NEW DRUG FOR RESTORING SENSITIVITY TO MULTIDRUG RESISTANT CANCER-CELLS [J].
HAIT, WN ;
GESMONDE, JF ;
MURREN, JR ;
YANG, JM ;
CHEN, HX ;
REISS, M .
BIOCHEMICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1993, 45 (02) :401-406
[7]   Lack of histamine synthesis and down-regulation of H1 and H2 receptor mRNA levels by dexamethasone in cerebral endothelial cells [J].
Karlstedt, K ;
Sallmén, T ;
Eriksson, KS ;
Lintunen, M ;
Couraud, PO ;
Joó, F ;
Panula, P .
JOURNAL OF CEREBRAL BLOOD FLOW AND METABOLISM, 1999, 19 (03) :321-330
[8]   SEDATION AND HISTAMINE-H1-RECEPTOR ANTAGONISM - STUDIES IN MAN WITH THE ENANTIOMERS OF CHLORPHENIRAMINE AND DIMETHINDENE [J].
NICHOLSON, AN ;
PASCOE, PA ;
TURNER, C ;
GANELLIN, CR ;
GREENGRASS, PM ;
CASY, AF ;
MERCER, AD .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY, 1991, 104 (01) :270-276
[9]   Interplay between CYP3A-mediated metabolism and polarized efflux of terfenadine and its metabolites in intestinal epithelial Caco-2 (TC7) cell monolayers [J].
Raeissi, SD ;
Hidalgo, IJ ;
Segura-Aguilar, J ;
Artursson, P .
PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH, 1999, 16 (05) :625-632
[10]  
Régina A, 1999, J NEUROCHEM, V73, P1954