Pathological Upgrading and Up Staging With Immediate Repeat Biopsy in Patients Eligible for Active Surveillance

被引:240
作者
Berglund, Ryan K. [1 ]
Masterson, Timothy A. [1 ]
Vora, Kinjal C. [1 ]
Eggener, Scott E. [1 ]
Eastham, James A. [1 ]
Guillonneau, Bertrand D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Div Urol, New York, NY 10021 USA
关键词
prostate; prostatic neoplasms; biopsy; neoplasm staging;
D O I
10.1016/j.juro.2008.07.051
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: Active surveillance with selective delayed intervention is a treatment regimen used in patients with low risk prostate cancer. Decision making is based on pretreatment prostate specific antigen, clinical stage and prostate biopsy results. We reviewed our experience with immediate repeat biopsy in patients eligible for active surveillance with selective delayed intervention. Materials and Methods: A retrospective review was done of the records of consecutive patients who underwent repeat biopsy within 3 months of a first positive biopsy from March 2002 to June 2007. Patients were considered eligible if they had prostate specific antigen less than 10 ng/ml, clinical stage T2a or less, Gleason pattern 3 or less, 3 or fewer positive cores and no single core with 50% or greater cancer involvement. Results: A total of 104 patients met eligibility criteria. Of the 104 repeat biopsies performed 27 (26%) were negative, 59 (57%) had a Gleason score of 6 or less and 17 (16%) had a Gleason score of 7. One patient had a Gleason score of 9, while 10 of 104 (10%) had greater than 3 cores involved on repeat biopsy and 12 (12%) had 50% or greater involvement of at least I core. Of 104 cases (27%) 28 were upgraded and/or up staged. Treated cases that were upgraded and/or up staged were more likely to show higher pathological stage and grade at radical prostatectomy than those that were not (p = 0.003 and p = 0.001, respectively). Conclusions: Immediate repeat biopsy in cases of active surveillance with selective delayed intervention resulted in 27% being upgraded or up staged and those were more likely to show higher grade and stage disease at radical prostatectomy. We recommend repeat biopsy because it improved our discrimination of who are the best candidates for active surveillance with selective delayed intervention.
引用
收藏
页码:1964 / 1967
页数:4
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   DEFERRED TREATMENT OF CLINICALLY LOCALIZED LOW-GRADE PROSTATE-CANCER - THE EXPERIENCE FROM A PROSPECTIVE SERIES AT THE KAROLINSKA-HOSPITAL [J].
ADOLFSSON, J ;
RONSTROM, L ;
LOWHAGEN, T ;
CARSTENSEN, J ;
HEDLUND, PO .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1994, 152 (05) :1757-1760
[2]   20-year outcomes following conservative management of clinically localized prostate cancer [J].
Albertsen, PC ;
Hanley, JA ;
Fine, J .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2005, 293 (17) :2095-2101
[3]   Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting in early prostate cancer [J].
Bill-Axelson, A ;
Holmberg, L ;
Ruutu, M ;
Häggman, M ;
Andersson, SO ;
Bratell, S ;
Spångberg, A ;
Busch, C ;
Nordling, S ;
Garmo, H ;
Palmgren, J ;
Adami, HO ;
Norlén, BJ ;
Johansson, JE .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2005, 352 (19) :1977-1984
[4]   Expectant management of nonpalpable prostate cancer with curative intent: Preliminary results [J].
Carter, HB ;
Walsh, PC ;
Landis, P ;
Epstein, JI .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 167 (03) :1231-1234
[5]   RESULTS OF CONSERVATIVE MANAGEMENT OF CLINICALLY LOCALIZED PROSTATE-CANCER [J].
CHODAK, GW ;
THISTED, RA ;
GERBER, GS ;
JOHANSSON, JE ;
ADOLFSSON, J ;
JONES, GW ;
CHISHOLM, GD ;
MOSKOVITZ, B ;
LIVNE, PM ;
WARNER, J .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1994, 330 (04) :242-248
[6]   How much does Gleason grade of follow-up biopsy differ from that of initial biopsy in untreated, Gleason score 4-7, clinically localized prostate cancer? [J].
Choo, R. ;
Danjoux, C. ;
Morton, G. ;
Szumacher, E. ;
Sugar, L. ;
Gardner, S. ;
Kim, M. ;
Choo, C. M. ;
Klotz, L. .
PROSTATE, 2007, 67 (15) :1614-1620
[7]   PATHOLOGICAL AND CLINICAL FINDINGS TO PREDICT TUMOR EXTENT OF NONPALPABLE (STAGE-T1C) PROSTATE-CANCER [J].
EPSTEIN, JI ;
WALSH, PC ;
CARMICHAEL, M ;
BRENDLER, CB .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1994, 271 (05) :368-374
[8]   Dedifferentiation of prostate cancer grade with time in men followed expectantly for stage T1C disease [J].
Epstein, JI ;
Walsh, PC ;
Carter, HB .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2001, 166 (05) :1688-1691
[9]   The extent of biopsy involvement as an independent predictor of extraprostatic extension and surgical margin status in low risk prostate cancer: Implications for treatment selection [J].
Gao, X ;
Mohideen, N ;
Flanigan, RC ;
Waters, WB ;
Wojcik, EM ;
Leman, CR .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2000, 164 (06) :1982-1986
[10]   Predicting disease recurrence in intermediate and high-risk patients undergoing radical prostatectomy using percent positive biopsies: Results from CaPSURE [J].
Grossfeld, GD ;
Latini, DM ;
Lubeck, DP ;
Broering, JM ;
Li, YP ;
Mehta, SS ;
Carroll, PR .
UROLOGY, 2002, 59 (04) :560-565