Evaluation of the biomethane potential from multiple waste streams for a proposed community scale anaerobic digester

被引:37
作者
Browne, James D. [1 ,2 ]
Allen, Eoin [1 ,2 ]
Murphy, Jerry D. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Ireland Univ Coll Cork, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Cork, Ireland
[2] Natl Univ Ireland Univ Coll Cork, Environm Res Inst, Cork, Ireland
基金
爱尔兰科学基金会;
关键词
anaerobic digestion; biogas; biomethane potential test; waste to energy; MUNICIPAL SOLID-WASTE; BIOGAS PRODUCTION; GRASS-SILAGE; BATCH; BIODEGRADABILITY; FRACTION; ENERGY; MANURE; BMP;
D O I
10.1080/09593330.2013.812669
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper examines the biomethane potential from organic waste for a proposed community scale anaerobic digester in a rural town. The biomethane potential test is used to assess the suitability of waste streams for biomethane production and to examine the variation in biomethane potential between waste sub-streams. A methodology for accurately estimating the biomethane potential from multiple heterogeneous organic waste substrates is sought. Five main waste streams were identified as possible substrates for biogas production, namely Abattoir waste (consisting of paunch and de-watered activated sludge); cheese factory effluent; commercial and domestic food waste; pig slurry and waste water treatment sludge. The biomethane potential of these waste streams ranged from as low as 99 L CH4 kg VS-1 for pig slurry to as high as 787 L CH4 kg VS-1 for dissolved air floatation (DAF) sludge from a cheese effluent treatment plant. The kinetic behaviour of the biomethane production in the batch test is also examined. The objective of the paper is to suggest an optimum substrate mix in terms of biomethane yield per unit substrate for the proposed anaerobic digester. This should maximize the yield of biomethane per capital investment. Food waste displayed the highest biomethane yield (128 m(n)(3) t(-1)) followed by cheese waste (38 m(n)(3) t(-1)) and abattoir waste (36 m(n)(3) t(-1)). It was suggested that waste sludge (16 m(n)(3) t(-1)) and pig slurry (4 m(n)(3) t(-1)) should not be digested. However, the biomethane potential test does not give information on the continuous operation of an anaerobic digester.
引用
收藏
页码:2027 / 2038
页数:12
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
Allen E, 2013, ENVIRON TECHNOL, DOI [10.1080/09593330.2013.812669, DOI 10.1080/09593330.2013.812669]
[2]   Defining the biomethane potential (BMP) of solid organic wastes and energy crops: a proposed protocol for batch assays [J].
Angelidaki, I. ;
Alves, M. ;
Bolzonella, D. ;
Borzacconi, L. ;
Campos, J. L. ;
Guwy, A. J. ;
Kalyuzhnyi, S. ;
Jenicek, P. ;
van Lier, J. B. .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 59 (05) :927-934
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Standard methods for the examination of water and waste- water
[4]   Co-digestion of pig manure and glycerine: Experimental and modelling study [J].
Astals, S. ;
Ariso, M. ;
Gali, A. ;
Mata-Alvarez, J. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2011, 92 (04) :1091-1096
[5]   A step-by-step guide to non-linear regression analysis of experimental data using a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet [J].
Brown, AM .
COMPUTER METHODS AND PROGRAMS IN BIOMEDICINE, 2001, 65 (03) :191-200
[6]   Assessment of the resource associated with biomethane from food waste [J].
Browne, James D. ;
Murphy, Jerry D. .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2013, 104 :170-177
[7]  
Budiyono IN, 2010, WORLD ACAD SCI ENG T, V37, P983
[8]  
Buswell A. M., 1930, BULLETIN, V30
[9]   Methane yield in source-sorted organic fraction of municipal solid waste [J].
Davidsson, Asa ;
Gruvberger, Christopher ;
Christensen, Thomas H. ;
Hansen, Trine Lund ;
Jansen, Jes la Cour .
WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2007, 27 (03) :406-414
[10]  
Department of Agriculture Fisheries and Food Ireland, 2010, FOOD HARV 2020 VIS I