Ethical, Legal, and Counseling Challenges Surrounding the Return of Genetic Results in Oncology

被引:73
作者
Lolkema, Martijn P. [1 ]
Gadellaa-van Hooijdonk, Christa G. [1 ]
Bredenoord, Annelien L. [1 ]
Kapitein, Peter [3 ]
Roach, Nancy [4 ]
Cuppen, Edwin [1 ,2 ]
Knoers, Nine V. [1 ]
Voest, Emile E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, NL-3508 GA Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Royal Netherlands Acad Arts & Sci, Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Inspire2Live, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Fight Colorectal Canc, Alexandria, VA USA
关键词
DECEASED PARTICIPANTS RELATIVES; QUALIFIED DISCLOSURE POLICY; CELL LUNG-CANCER; BREAST-CANCER; INCIDENTAL FINDINGS; AMERICAN-SOCIETY; STATEMENT UPDATE; GENOMIC PRIVACY; BRCA2; MUTATION; INFORMATION;
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2012.45.2789
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
In the last decade, an overwhelming number of genetic aberrations have been discovered and linked to the development of treatment for cancer. With the rapid advancement of next-generation sequencing (NGS) techniques, it is expected that large-scale DNA analyses will increasingly be used to select patients for treatment with specific anticancer agents. Personalizing cancer treatment has many advantages, but sequencing germline DNA as reference material for interpreting cancer genetics may have consequences that extend beyond providing cancer care for an individual patient. In sequencing germline DNA, mutations may be encountered that are associated with increased susceptibility not only to hereditary cancer syndromes but also to other diseases; in those cases, disclosing germline data could be clinically relevant and even lifesaving. In the context of personal autonomy, it is necessary to develop an ethical and legal framework for how to deal with identified hereditary disease susceptibilities and how to return the data to patients and their families. Because clear legislation is lacking, we need to establish guidelines on disclosure of genetic information and, in the process, we need to balance privacy issues with the potential advantages and drawbacks of sharing genetic data with patients and their relatives. Importantly, a strong partnership with patients is critical for understanding how to maximize the translation of genetic information for the benefit of patients with cancer. This review discusses the ethical, legal, and counseling issues surrounding disclosure of genetic information generated by NGS to patients with cancer and their relatives. We also provide a framework for returning these genetic results by proposing a design for a qualified disclosure policy.
引用
收藏
页码:1842 / +
页数:8
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]   You never call, you never write: why return of 'omic' results to research participants is both a good idea and a moral imperative [J].
Angrist, Misha .
PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2011, 8 (06) :651-657
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1998, AM J HUM GENET, V62, P474
[3]   Opportunities and challenges for the integration of massively parallel genomic sequencing into clinical practice: lessons from the ClinSeq project [J].
Biesecker, Leslie G. .
GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2012, 14 (04) :393-398
[4]   Public preferences regarding the return of individual genetic research results: findings from a qualitative focus group study [J].
Bollinger, Juli Murphy ;
Scott, Joan ;
Dvoskin, Rachel ;
Kaufman, David .
GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2012, 14 (04) :451-457
[5]   Disclosing Individual Genetic Research Results to Deceased Participants' Relatives by Means of a Qualified Disclosure Policy [J].
Bredenoord, Annelien L. ;
van Delden, Johannes J. M. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS, 2012, 12 (10) :10-12
[6]   Feedback of Individual Genetic Results to Research Participants: In Favor of a Qualified Disclosure Policy [J].
Bredenoord, Annelien L. ;
Onland-Moret, N. Charlotte ;
Van Delden, Johannes J. M. .
HUMAN MUTATION, 2011, 32 (08) :861-867
[7]   Disclosure of individual genetic data to research participants: the debate reconsidered [J].
Bredenoord, Annelien L. ;
Kroes, Hester Y. ;
Cuppen, Edwin ;
Parker, Michael ;
van Delden, Johannes J. M. .
TRENDS IN GENETICS, 2011, 27 (02) :41-47
[8]   American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement update: Genetic testing for cancer susceptibility [J].
Bruinooge, SS .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 21 (12) :2397-2406
[9]   Colorectal cancer cases and relatives of cases indicate similar willingness to receive and disclose genetic information [J].
Ceballos, Rachel M. ;
Newcomb, Polly A. ;
Beasley, Jeannette M. ;
Peterson, Scot ;
Templeton, Allyson ;
Hunt, Julie R. .
GENETIC TESTING, 2008, 12 (03) :415-420
[10]  
Chan B, 2012, J GEN INTERN MED, V12, P1