Glandular breast dose for monoenergetic and high-energy X-ray beams: Monte Carlo assessment

被引:245
作者
Boone, JM [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Radiol Res Labs, Sacramento, CA 95817 USA
关键词
breast radiography; radiation dose; technology; utilization; physics;
D O I
10.1148/radiology.213.1.r99oc3923
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To extend the utility of normalized glandular dose (D-gN) calculations to higher x-ray energies (up to 120 keV) and to provide the tools for investigators to calculate D-gN values for arbitrary mammographic and x-ray spectra. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Validated Monte Carte methods were used to assess D-gN values. One million x-ray photons (1-120 keV, in 1-keV increments)were input to a semicircular breast geometry of thicknesses from 2 to 12 cm and breast compositions from 0% to 100% glandular. D-gN values for monoenergetic (1-120 keV) x-ray beams, polyenergetic (40-120 kV, tungsten anode) x-ray spectra, and polyenergetic mammographic spectra were computed. Skin thicknesses of 4-5 mm were used. RESULTS: The calculated D-gN Values were in agreement within approximately 1%-6% with previously published data, depending on breast composition. D-gN tables were constructed for a variety of x-ray tube anode-filter combinations, including molybdenum anode-molybdenum filter, molybdenum anode-rhodium filter, rhodium anode-rhodium filter, tungsten anode-rhodium filter; tungsten anode-palladium filter, and tungsten anode-silver filter. D-gN values also were graphed for monoenergetic beams to 120 keV and for general diagnostic x-ray beams to 120 kV. CONCLUSION: The tables and graphs may be useful for optimizing mammographic procedures. The higher energy data may be useful for investigations of the potential of dual-energy mammography or for calculation of dose in general diagnostic or computed tomographic procedures.
引用
收藏
页码:23 / 37
页数:15
相关论文
共 29 条
[11]   CALCULATION OF DOSE AND CONTRAST FOR 2 MAMMOGRAPHIC GRIDS [J].
DANCE, DR ;
PERSLIDEN, J ;
CARLSSON, GA .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1992, 37 (01) :235-248
[12]   MONTE-CARLO CALCULATION OF CONVERSION FACTORS FOR THE ESTIMATION OF MEAN GLANDULAR BREAST DOSE [J].
DANCE, DR .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1990, 35 (09) :1211-1219
[14]  
DOI K, 1980, RADIOLOGY, V135, P199, DOI 10.1148/radiology.135.1.7360961
[15]   ASSESSMENT OF MEAN GLANDULAR DOSE IN MAMMOGRAPHY [J].
FAULKNER, K ;
LAW, J ;
ROBSON, KJ .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1995, 68 (812) :877-881
[16]   TLD measurements of in vivo mammographic exposures and the calculated mean glandular dose across the United States [J].
Gentry, JR ;
DeWerd, LA .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1996, 23 (06) :899-903
[17]   CONTRAST AND DOSE WITH MO-MO, MO-RH, AND RH-RH TARGET-FILTER COMBINATIONS IN MAMMOGRAPHY [J].
GINGOLD, EL ;
WU, XZ ;
BARNES, GT .
RADIOLOGY, 1995, 195 (03) :639-644
[18]  
HAMMERSTEIN GR, 1979, RADIOLOGY, V130, P485
[19]   BREAST THICKNESS IN ROUTINE MAMMOGRAMS - EFFECT ON IMAGE QUALITY AND RADIATION-DOSE [J].
HELVIE, MA ;
CHAN, HP ;
ADLER, DD ;
BOYD, PG .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1994, 163 (06) :1371-1374
[20]   RADIATION-DOSE TO THE BREAST DURING MAMMOGRAPHY - A COMPREHENSIVE, REALISTIC MONTE-CARLO CALCULATION [J].
KULKARNI, RN ;
SUPE, SJ .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1984, 29 (10) :1257-1264