Importance of distributional form in characterizing inputs to Monte Carlo risk assessments

被引:31
作者
Haas, CN
机构
[1] Dept. of Environmental Engineering, Drexel University, Philadelphia
关键词
distributions; extreme values; gamma; lognormal; Weibull; inverse gaussian; Monte Carlo analysis;
D O I
10.1111/j.1539-6924.1997.tb00849.x
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
The selection among distributional forms for inputs into uncertainty and variability (e.g., Monte Carlo) analyses is an important task. This paper considers the importance of distributional selection by examining the overall and tail behavior of the lognormal, Weibull, gamma, and inverse gaussian distributions. It is concluded that at low relative standard deviation (below 1), there is less of a difference between upper tail behavior among the distributions than at higher RSD values. Sample sizes in excess of 200 are required to reliably distinguish between distributional forms at the higher RSD values. The likelihood statistic appears to offer a reasonable approach to distributional discrimination, and it, or a similar approach, should be incorporated into distributional fitting procedures used in risk analysis.
引用
收藏
页码:107 / 113
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], MATLAB
[2]   PROBABILITY-DISTRIBUTIONS FOR HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY OF COMPACTED SOIL LINERS [J].
BENSON, CH .
JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 1993, 119 (03) :471-486
[3]   PRINCIPLES OF GOOD PRACTICE FOR THE USE OF MONTE-CARLO TECHNIQUES IN HUMAN HEALTH AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENTS [J].
BURMASTER, DE ;
ANDERSON, PD .
RISK ANALYSIS, 1994, 14 (04) :477-481
[4]   GAS HOLDUPS AND BUBBLE CHARACTERISTICS IN A BUBBLE-COLUMN OPERATED AT HIGH-TEMPERATURE [J].
CHABOT, J ;
DELASA, HI .
INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 1993, 32 (11) :2595-2601
[5]   DEALING WITH UNCERTAINTY - FROM HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT TO ENVIRONMENTAL DECISION-MAKING [J].
COX, LA ;
RICCI, PF .
JOURNAL OF ENERGY ENGINEERING-ASCE, 1992, 118 (02) :77-94
[6]   DISCRIMINATION BETWEEN LOG-NORMAL AND WEIBULL DISTRIBUTIONS [J].
DUMONCEAUX, R ;
ANTLE, CE .
TECHNOMETRICS, 1973, 15 (04) :923-926
[7]   ASSESSING THE INVERSE GAUSSIAN DISTRIBUTION ASSUMPTION [J].
EDGEMAN, RL .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON RELIABILITY, 1990, 39 (03) :352-355
[8]  
Finkel A. M., 1990, Confronting Uncertainty in Risk Management: A Guide for Decision Makers a Report
[9]   RECOMMENDED DISTRIBUTIONS FOR EXPOSURE FACTORS FREQUENTLY USED IN HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT [J].
FINLEY, B ;
PROCTOR, D ;
SCOTT, P ;
HARRINGTOIN, N ;
PAUSTENBACH, D ;
PRICE, P .
RISK ANALYSIS, 1994, 14 (04) :533-551
[10]   ESTIMATING THE CRITICAL TIME OF THE INVERSE GAUSSIAN HAZARD RATE [J].
HSIEH, HK .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON RELIABILITY, 1990, 39 (03) :342-345