Comparison between lidar and nephelometer measurements of aerosol hygroscopicity at the Southern Great Plains Atmospheric Radiation Measurement site

被引:38
作者
Pahlow, M
Feingold, G
Jefferson, A
Andrews, E
Ogren, JA
Wang, J
Lee, YN
Ferrare, RA
Turner, DD
机构
[1] NOAA, Environm Technol Lab, Boulder, CO 80305 USA
[2] NOAA, Climate Monitoring & Diagnost Lab, Boulder, CO 80305 USA
[3] Brookhaven Natl Lab, Upton, NY 11973 USA
[4] NASA, Langley Res Ctr, Hampton, VA 23681 USA
[5] Pacific NW Natl Lab, Richland, WA 99352 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1029/2004JD005646
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
[1] Aerosol hygroscopicity has a significant effect on radiative properties of aerosols. Here a lidar method, applicable to cloud-capped, well-mixed atmospheric boundary layers, is employed to determine the hygroscopic growth factor f(RH) under unperturbed, ambient atmospheric conditions. The data used for the analysis were collected under a wide range of atmospheric aerosol levels during both routine measurement periods and during the intensive operations period (IOP) in May 2003 at the Southern Great Plains (SGP) Climate Research Facility in Oklahoma, USA, as part of the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement ( ARM) program. There is a good correlation ( similar to 0.7) between a lidar-derived growth factor ( measured over the range 85% RH to 96% RH) with a nephelometer-derived growth factor measured over the RH range 40% to 85%. For these RH ranges, the slope of the lidar-derived growth curve is much steeper than that of the nephelometer-derived growth curve, reflecting the rapid increase in particle size with increasing RH. The results are corroborated by aerosol model calculations of lidar backscatter and nephelometer equivalent f( RH) based on in situ aerosol size and composition measurements during the IOP. It is suggested that the lidar method can provide useful measurements of the dependence of aerosol optical properties on relative humidity and under conditions closer to saturation than can currently be achieved with humidified nephelometers.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 32 条
[11]   Aerosol hygroscopic properties as measured by lidar and comparison with in situ measurements [J].
Feingold, G ;
Morley, B .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2003, 108 (D11)
[12]   Raman lidar measurements of aerosol extinction and backscattering - 2. Derivation of aerosol real refractive index, single-scattering albedo, and humidification factor using Raman lidar and aircraft size distribution measurements [J].
Ferrare, RA ;
Melfi, SH ;
Whiteman, DN ;
Evans, KD ;
Poellot, M ;
Kaufman, YJ .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1998, 103 (D16) :19673-19689
[13]   Turn-key Raman lidar for profiling atmospheric water vapor, clouds, and aerosols [J].
Goldsmith, JEM ;
Blair, FH ;
Bisson, SE ;
Turner, DD .
APPLIED OPTICS, 1998, 37 (21) :4979-4990
[14]  
Iribarne J. V., 1973, ATMOSPHERIC THERMODY
[15]   VISIBILITY FORECAST IN PHASE OF PRE-CONDENSATION [J].
KASTEN, F .
TELLUS, 1969, 21 (05) :630-&
[16]   Humidification factors for atmospheric aerosols off the mid-Atlantic coast of the United States [J].
Kotchenruther, RA ;
Hobbs, PV ;
Hegg, DA .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1999, 104 (D2) :2239-2251
[17]   Humidification factors of aerosols from biomass burning in Brazil [J].
Kotchenruther, RA ;
Hobbs, PV .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1998, 103 (D24) :32081-32089
[18]   Humidity-dependent optical properties of fine particles during the Big Bend regional aerosol and visibility observational study [J].
Malm, WC ;
Day, DE ;
Kreidenweis, SM ;
Collett, JL ;
Lee, T .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2003, 108 (D9)
[19]   Apportionment of light scattering and hygroscopic growth to aerosol composition [J].
McInnes, L ;
Bergin, M ;
Ogren, J ;
Schwartz, S .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 1998, 25 (04) :513-516
[20]   ON THE SENSITIVITY OF PARTICLE-SIZE TO RELATIVE-HUMIDITY FOR LOS-ANGELES AEROSOLS [J].
MCMURRY, PH ;
STOLZENBURG, MR .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 1989, 23 (02) :497-507