Cost-effectiveness of treatment for threshold retinopathy of prematurity

被引:49
作者
Brown, GC
Brown, MM
Sharma, S
Tasman, W
Brown, HC
机构
[1] Ctr Evidence Based Healthcare, Flourtown, PA 19031 USA
[2] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Jefferson Med Coll, Wills Eye Hosp, Retina Serv, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[3] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Jefferson Med Coll, Wills Eye Hosp, Cataract & Primary Eye Care Serv, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[4] Harvard Univ, Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirm, Sch Med, Epidemiol Unit, Boston, MA USA
关键词
threshold retinopathy of prematurity; laser therapy; cryotherapy; cost-effectiveness;
D O I
10.1542/peds.104.4.e47
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Objective. Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is a leading cause of adverse visual outcomes in premature infants. Both laser photocoagulation and cryotherapy have been demonstrated in clinical trials to be efficacious in reducing the incidence of visual loss occurring secondary to threshold ROP. Visual data recently have become available concerning the long-term clinical efficacy of both treatments, as have data concerning the utility value of visual states in general. Accordingly, we undertook an analysis to ascertain the cost-effectiveness of laser photocoagulation and cryotherapy in the treatment of threshold ROP. Design. A computer simulation economic model is presented to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of cryotherapy and laser photocoagulation therapy, compared with the natural course of the disease, for treating premature infants with threshold ROP. The model applies longterm visual data from previous clinical trials, utility analysis, decision analysis, and economic principles, such as present value analysis, to account for the time value of money to arrive at a cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. Outcome Measures. Cost per QALY gained from laser therapy and cryotherapy. Results. Laser photocoagulation therapy for threshold ROP costs $678 1998 US dollars (at a 3% discount rate to account for the time value of money) for each QALY gained from treatment. Cryotherapy for the same disease costs $1801 per QALY at a similar discount rate. Conclusions. From the point of view of cost-effectiveness, laser therapy seems to have an advantage over cryotherapy for the treatment of threshold ROP.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   PATIENTS PREFERENCES IN RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIALS [J].
ANGELL, M .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1984, 310 (21) :1385-1387
[2]  
BROWN GC, 1990, OPHTHALMOLOGY, V97, P855
[3]  
BROWN GC, IN PRESS J HLTH CARE
[4]  
Brown M M, 1999, Curr Opin Ophthalmol, V10, P221, DOI 10.1097/00055735-199906000-00012
[5]  
*BUR LAB STAT, 1998, CONS PRIC IND
[6]   A comparison of laser photocoagulation with trans-scleral cryotherapy in the treatment of threshold retinopathy of prematurity [J].
Connolly, BP ;
McNamara, JA ;
Sharma, S ;
Regillo, CD ;
Tasman, W .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1998, 105 (09) :1628-1631
[7]  
DAMODARAN A, 1997, CORPORATE FINANCE TH, P37
[8]   ARE CLINICAL-TRIALS A COST-EFFECTIVE INVESTMENT [J].
DETSKY, AS .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1989, 262 (13) :1795-1800
[9]  
DRUMMOND MF, 1988, OPHTHALMOLOGY, V95, P1147
[10]  
Elsas FJ, 1996, ARCH OPHTHALMOL-CHIC, V114, P417