The efficiency costs of separating carbon markets under the EU emissions trading scheme:: A quantitative assessment for Germany

被引:40
作者
Böhringer, C
Hoffmann, T
Manrique-de-Lara-Peñate, C
机构
[1] Cutr European Econ Res, ZEW, D-68034 Mannheim, Germany
[2] Heidelberg Univ, Dept Econ, Heidelberg, Germany
[3] Univ Las Palmas de GC, Dept Appl Econ Anal, Las Palmas Gran Canaria, Spain
关键词
emissions trading; national allocation plans;
D O I
10.1016/j.eneco.2005.09.001
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
From I January 2005 onwards the European Union has launched the first large-scale international carbon emissions trading program. As the EU Emissions Trading Scheme (EU-ETS) covers only part of domestic carbon emissions, it implies a segmented environmental regulation scheme: Each EU Member State must specify additional domestic abatement policies for the sectors outside the EU-ETS in order to meet its emissions budget under the EU Burden Sharing Agreement. We highlight the generic problems of segmented carbon regulation in terms of information requirements for international carbon prices and domestic abatement costs of sectors outside the EU-ETS. Based on numerical simulations for Germany, we quantify the excess costs of segmented carbon regulation and conclude that inefficiencies can be much better explained by lobbying of influential EU-ETS sectors than by information problems. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:44 / 61
页数:18
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   Mission impossible!?: On the harmonization of national allocation plans under the EU emissions trading directive [J].
Böhringer, C ;
Lange, A .
JOURNAL OF REGULATORY ECONOMICS, 2005, 27 (01) :81-94
[2]  
Böhringer C, 2005, ENERGY J, V26, P1
[3]   Industry-level emission trading between power producers in the EU [J].
Böhringer, C .
APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2002, 34 (04) :523-533
[4]  
BOHRINGER C, EUROPEAN EC REV
[5]  
Brooke Anthony, 1987, GAMS USERS GUIDE
[6]  
DIMARANAN BV, 2002, GLOBAL TRADE ASSISTA
[7]  
Dirkse Steven P., 1995, Optim. Methods Softw., V5, P123, DOI DOI 10.1080/10556789508805606
[8]  
*EU, 2003, EUR EN TRANSP TRENDS
[9]  
Gilbert A., 2004, ANAL NATL ALLOCATION
[10]  
JOHNSTONE N, 2002, ENVEPOCWPNEP28 OECD