Present and future ecological footprint of Slovenia - The influence of energy demand scenarios

被引:37
作者
Medved, S [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ljubljana, Fac Mech Engn, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia
关键词
sustainable development; ecological footprint; biological capacity; Slovenia; energy demand scenarios;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.06.007
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The international community - including Slovenia, which recently became a EU member state - has expressed its commitment to sustainable development. The methods necessary to measure the degrees of success in achieving this final goal must be developed in parallel. Recently, the ecological footprint method has gained more prominence. In this paper, for the first time, the Slovenian ecological footprint is presented. It was found that current ecological footprint of Slovenia (3.85 gha/capita) exceeds the available biological productive areas (2.55 gha/capita) and significantly exceeds the biological productive areas of the planet (1.9 gha/capita). Therefore, Slovenia must be classified as a country with non-sustainable development, both on locally and globally scale. Because of the large influence of the energy supply on the ecological footprint, several national strategies and international directives promoting energy conservation and renewable energy sources were accepted. These documents were taken into consideration when predicting the future ecological footprint of Slovenia for the year 2020. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:25 / 36
页数:12
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
Chambers N., 2000, Sharing Nature's Interest: Ecological footprints as an indicator of sustainability, DOI DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2014.01.004
[2]   Land-use change and socio-economic metabolism in Austria - Part II: land-use scenarios for 2020 [J].
Haberl, H ;
Erb, KH ;
Krausmann, F ;
Adensam, H ;
Schulz, NB .
LAND USE POLICY, 2003, 20 (01) :21-39
[3]   How to calculate and interpret ecological footprints for long periods of time: the case of Austria 1926-1995 [J].
Haberl, H ;
Erb, KH ;
Krausmann, F .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2001, 38 (01) :25-45
[4]  
*IWM, 2002, I WAST MAN ENV BOD C
[5]  
Lomborg B., 2001, The Skeptical Environmentalist
[6]  
MEDVED S, 2001, PROGRAM RENEWABLE SO
[7]  
*MG, 2003, NAT EN RES
[8]  
MONFREDA C, 2003, ESTABLISHING NATL NA, P1
[9]  
*NRDC, 2004, GOOD THROW AW
[10]  
*RP, 2003, RED PROGR