Network Characteristics and Patenting in Biotechnology, 1990-2006

被引:47
作者
Demirkan, Irem [1 ]
Demirkan, Sebahattin [2 ]
机构
[1] Northeastern Univ, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Suffolk Univ, Boston, MA 02108 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
collaboration networks; network characteristics; innovation; biotechnology industry; endogeneity; INTERORGANIZATIONAL COLLABORATION; RELATIONAL EMBEDDEDNESS; EMPIRICAL-EXAMINATION; DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; MARKET UNCERTAINTY; KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER; STRUCTURAL HOLES; SOCIAL NETWORKS; FIRM NETWORKS;
D O I
10.1177/0149206311408319
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In this study, the authors focus on specifically which types of networks and what types of relationships matter most for the focal firm's innovative performance in biotechnology patenting. They suggest that certain network characteristics, such as quality and the source of knowledge, and the quality of relationships among actors may have a profound effect on the knowledge exchange and hence the number of patents granted to the firm. The authors focus on the research coauthorship networks of 381 firms in the U.S. biotechnology industry over a span of 17 years, from 1990 to 2006. In the biotechnology industry, firms depend heavily on the social network of academic scientists for the exchange and production of knowledge, with firm-level patenting closely linked to it. Their findings largely support the hypotheses, suggesting the necessity to consider the characteristics of the actors and the qualitative nature of the relationships in the network while assessing the role of the firm's networks on its patenting.
引用
收藏
页码:1892 / 1927
页数:36
相关论文
共 115 条
[81]  
Podolny JoelM., 2005, STATUS SIGNALS
[82]  
Popp D., 2003, NBER Working Paper, 9518
[83]   Network dynamics and field evolution: The growth of interorganizational collaboration in the life sciences [J].
Powell, WW ;
White, DR ;
Koput, KW ;
Owen-Smith, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 2005, 110 (04) :1132-1205
[84]  
POWELL WW, 1992, NETWORKS AND ORGANIZATIONS : STRUCTURE, FORM, AND ACTION, P366
[85]  
POWELL WW, 1990, RES ORGAN BEHAV, V12, P295
[86]   Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology [J].
Powell, WW ;
Koput, KW ;
SmithDoerr, L .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1996, 41 (01) :116-145
[87]   Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range [J].
Reagans, R ;
McEvily, B .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2003, 48 (02) :240-267
[88]   Reputation as an Intangible Asset: Reflections on Theory and Methods in Two Empirical Studies of Business School Reputations [J].
Rindova, Violina P. ;
Williamson, Ian O. ;
Petkova, Antoaneta P. .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2010, 36 (03) :610-619
[89]  
Rindova VP, 2005, ACAD MANAGE J, V48, P1033, DOI 10.2307/20159728
[90]   More than network structure: How knowledge heterogeneity influences managerial performance and innovativeness [J].
Rodan, S ;
Galunic, C .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2004, 25 (06) :541-562