Importance of soft tissue inhomogeneity in magnetic peripheral nerve stimulation

被引:22
作者
Kobayashi, M [1 ]
Ueno, S [1 ]
Kurokawa, T [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV TOKYO,FAC MED,DEPT ORTHOPAED,BUNKYO KU,TOKYO 113,JAPAN
来源
ELECTROMYOGRAPHY AND MOTOR CONTROL-ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY | 1997年 / 105卷 / 05期
关键词
peripheral nerve; magnetic stimulation; figure-of-eight coil; median nerve; volume conductor model; tissue inhomogeneity;
D O I
10.1016/S0924-980X(97)00035-0
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
In magnetic peripheral nerve stimulation with a figure-of-eight coil, a 'tangential-edge' coil orientation (the nerve is beneath the coil intersection and perpendicular to the coil wings) is ideal theoretically. However, some experimental results show that strong muscle responses are elicited with a 'symmetrical-tangential' coil orientation (the nerve is beneath the coil intersection and parallel to the coil wings), which is inconsistent with the cable theory. We hypothesized that the 10:1 conductivity difference between muscle and fat would cause inconsistent results during magnetic median nerve stimulation in the elbow, which was verified using an inhomogeneous volume conductor model. The induced electric fields were measured in a model composed of saline solutions of different concentrations divided by a cellophane sheet. A nerve was imagined along the boundary between the two solutions, and the coil was held in a 'symmetrical-tangential' position. Virtual cathodes, which were off the nerve in the homogeneous model, were on the nerve in the inhomogeneous model. The previous inconsistent results were explained by considering soft tissue inhomogeneity without any modification of the assumption in the cable theory that only the induced electric field component parallel to the nerve is responsible for nerve excitation. (C) 1997 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:406 / 413
页数:8
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   FOCAL STIMULATION OF HUMAN PERIPHERAL-NERVE WITH THE MAGNETIC COIL - A COMPARISON WITH ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION [J].
AMASSIAN, VE ;
MACCABEE, PJ ;
CRACCO, RQ .
EXPERIMENTAL NEUROLOGY, 1989, 103 (03) :282-289
[2]  
CHOKROVERTY S, 1990, MAGNETIC STIMULATION, P249
[3]   THE INFLUENCE OF STIMULUS TYPE ON THE MAGNETIC EXCITATION OF NERVE STRUCTURES [J].
CLAUS, D ;
MURRAY, NMF ;
SPITZER, A ;
FLUGEL, D .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1990, 75 (04) :342-349
[4]   EFFECTS OF COIL DESIGN ON DELIVERY OF FOCAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION - TECHNICAL CONSIDERATIONS [J].
COHEN, LG ;
ROTH, BJ ;
NILSSON, J ;
DANG, N ;
PANIZZA, M ;
BANDINELLI, S ;
FRIAUF, W ;
HALLETT, M .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1990, 75 (04) :350-357
[5]   SPATIAL-DISPERSION OF MAGNETIC STIMULATION IN PERIPHERAL-NERVES [J].
CROS, D ;
DAY, TJ ;
SHAHANI, BT .
MUSCLE & NERVE, 1990, 13 (11) :1076-1082
[6]  
DURAND D, 1989, 11TH IEEE ENG MED BI, P1252
[7]   MAGNETIC STIMULATION OF THE PERIPHERAL NERVOUS-SYSTEM [J].
EVANS, BA .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1991, 8 (01) :77-84
[8]   THE UTILITY OF MAGNETIC STIMULATION FOR ROUTINE PERIPHERAL-NERVE CONDUCTION STUDIES [J].
EVANS, BA ;
LITCHY, WJ ;
DAUBE, JR .
MUSCLE & NERVE, 1988, 11 (10) :1074-1078
[9]  
FOSTER KR, 1989, CRIT REV BIOMED ENG, V17, P25
[10]  
HALLETT M, 1990, MAGNETIC STIMULATION, P275