Modeling fluvial incision and transient landscape evolution: Influence of dynamic channel adjustment

被引:141
作者
Attal, M. [1 ]
Tucker, G. E. [2 ,3 ]
Whittaker, A. C. [1 ]
Cowie, P. A. [1 ]
Roberts, G. P. [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Edinburgh, Sch GeoSci, Inst Earth Sci, Edinburgh EH9 3JW, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] Univ Colorado, Cooperat Inst Res Environm Sci, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
[3] Univ Colorado, Dept Geol Sci, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
[4] Univ London Birkbeck Coll, Res Sch Geol & Geophys Sci, London WC1E 6BT, England
[5] UCL, London, England
基金
英国自然环境研究理事会;
关键词
D O I
10.1029/2007JF000893
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Channel geometry exerts a fundamental control on fluvial processes. Recent work has shown that bedrock channel width depends on a number of parameters, including channel slope, and is not solely a function of drainage area as is commonly assumed. The present work represents the first attempt to investigate the consequences of dynamic, gradient-sensitive channel adjustment for drainage-basin evolution. We use the Channel-Hillslope Integrated Landscape Development (CHILD) model to analyze the response of a catchment to a given tectonic perturbation, using, as a template, the topography of a well-documented catchment in the footwall of an active normal fault in the Apennines (Italy) that is known to be undergoing a transient response to tectonic forcing. We show that the observed transient response can be reproduced to first order with a simple detachment-limited fluvial incision law. Transient landscape is characterized by gentler gradients and a shorter response time when dynamic channel adjustment is allowed. The differences in predicted channel geometry between the static case (width dependent solely on upstream area) and dynamic case (width dependent on both drainage area and channel slope) lead to contrasting landscape morphologies when integrated at the scale of a whole catchment, particularly in presence of strong tilting and/or pronounced slip-rate acceleration. Our results emphasize the importance of channel width in controlling fluvial processes and landscape evolution. They stress the need for using a dynamic hydraulic scaling law when modeling landscape evolution, particularly when the relative uplift field is nonuniform.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]   Channel width response to differential uplift [J].
Amos, Colin B. ;
Burbank, Douglas W. .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-EARTH SURFACE, 2007, 112 (F2)
[2]   THE GROWTH OF FAULT-BOUNDED TILT BLOCKS [J].
ANDERS, MH ;
SPIEGELMAN, M ;
RODGERS, DW ;
HAGSTRUM, JT .
TECTONICS, 1993, 12 (06) :1451-1459
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1953, GEOL SURV PROF PAPER
[4]   Quaternary evolution of the Corinth Rift and its implications for the Late Cenozoic evolution of the Aegean [J].
Armijo, R ;
Meyer, B ;
King, GCP ;
Rigo, A ;
Papanastassiou, D .
GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 1996, 126 (01) :11-53
[5]   Drainage rearrangement by river capture, beheading and diversion [J].
Bishop, P .
PROGRESS IN PHYSICAL GEOGRAPHY, 1995, 19 (04) :449-473
[6]   Influence of incision rate, rock strength, and bedload supply on bedrock river gradients and valley-flat widths: Field-based evidence and calibrations from western Alpine rivers (southeast France) [J].
Brocard, G. Y. ;
van der Beek, P. A. .
TECTONICS, CLIMATE, AND LANDSCAPE EVOLUTION, 2006, 398 :101-126
[7]   A systematic analysis of eight decades of incipient motion studies, with special reference to gravel-bedded rivers [J].
Buffington, JM ;
Montgomery, DR .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1997, 33 (08) :1993-2029
[8]   Bedrock incision, rock uplift and threshold hillslopes in the northwestern Himalayas [J].
Burbank, DW ;
Leland, J ;
Fielding, E ;
Anderson, RS ;
Brozovic, N ;
Reid, MR ;
Duncan, C .
NATURE, 1996, 379 (6565) :505-510
[9]   Numerical model linking bed and bank evolution of incisional channel created by dam removal [J].
Cantelli, A. ;
Wong, M. ;
Parker, G. ;
Paola, C. .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2007, 43 (07)
[10]   Fluvial erosion of physically modeled abrasion-dominated slot canyons [J].
Carter, Carissa L. ;
Anderson, Robert S. .
GEOMORPHOLOGY, 2006, 81 (1-2) :89-113