Trading Sand, Undermining Lives: Omitted Livelihoods in the Global Trade in Sand

被引:80
作者
Lamb, Vanessa [1 ]
Marschke, Melissa [2 ]
Rigg, Jonathan [3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Sch Geog, Melbourne, Vic 3053, Australia
[2] Univ Ottawa, Global Studies, Sch Int Dev, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada
[3] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Geog, Kent Ridge Crescent 119260, Singapore
[4] Natl Univ Singapore, Asia Res Inst, Kent Ridge Crescent 119260, Singapore
[5] Univ Bristol, Sch Geog Sci, Bristol, Avon, England
关键词
global production networks; livelihoods; precarity; sand mining; Southeast Asia; PRODUCTION NETWORKS; VALUE CHAINS; ECONOMIC-GEOGRAPHY; ETHICAL TRADE; MIGRATION; PRECARITY; DISPOSSESSION; CAPITALISM; CHALLENGES; RETAILERS;
D O I
10.1080/24694452.2018.1541401
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学]; K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
Sand is a scarce resource, extracted from rivers and coasts at rates that exceed its natural renewal. Yet, little is understood about the political economy of sand extraction, the livelihood vulnerabilities produced, or why sand grabbing is occurring at unprecedented rates in particular locations. Drawing together literature on global production network approaches in economic geography and debates on sustainable livelihoods in development geography-two literatures rarely in conversation with one another-we reveal the links between new, globalized, cross-border articulations of poverty and prosperity and the sand trade. We situate our sand case in Southeast Asia across three sites, namely, in Singapore, the world's top sand importer; Cambodia, a top-ten global exporter of sand; and an emerging exporter, Myanmar. We examine how sand mining affects, directly and indirectly, a range of livelihoods, specifically fisheries in Cambodia, riverbank agriculture in Myanmar, and migrant labor in Singapore. Drawing on our empirical work, we argue that linking these two literatures with empirical data on sand provides an approach that is broad in its connections and simultaneously grounded in specific practices, places, and people. This enables us to better account for often overlooked aspects in the production, erosion, and transfer of value.
引用
收藏
页码:1511 / 1528
页数:18
相关论文
共 87 条
[31]  
De Koninck R., 2017, Singapore's Permanent Territorial Revolution: Fifty Years in Fifty Maps
[32]  
Department of Economic and Social Affairs/United Nations Statistics Division, 2018, UN 2018 COMTR DAT
[33]  
Ei Thu E., 2015, MYANMAR TIMES 0408
[34]  
Ferguson James., 2015, Give a Man a Fish
[35]  
Gibson K, 2018, ROUTL HANDBK, P131
[36]   Primitive accumulation, accumulation by dispossession, accumulation by 'extra-economic' means [J].
Glassman, Jim .
PROGRESS IN HUMAN GEOGRAPHY, 2006, 30 (05) :608-625
[37]   The Geo-political Economy of Global Production Networks [J].
Glassman, Jim .
GEOGRAPHY COMPASS, 2011, 5 (04) :154-164
[38]  
Global Witness, 2008, COUNTR FOR SAL
[39]   Denaturalizing dispossession: Critical ethnography in the age of resurgent imperialism [J].
Hart, Gillian .
ANTIPODE, 2006, 38 (05) :977-1004
[40]  
Harvey D., 2004, NEW IMPERIALISM