Is nuchal translucency screening associated with different rates of invasive testing in an older obstetric population?

被引:29
作者
Chasen, ST [1 ]
McCullough, LB [1 ]
Chervenak, FA [1 ]
机构
[1] Cornell Univ, Weill Med Coll, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, New York, NY USA
关键词
nuchal translucency; chorionic villus sampling;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajog.2003.09.067
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: Our objective was to assess the impact of nuchal translucency screening for aneuploidy on chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis rates in an older obstetric population. Methods: Our study population included women 35 years old who were delivered at our hospital from. January 1, 2000 through December 31, 2002. Records were reviewed to determine whether women underwent nuchal translucency, chorionic villus sampling, and amniocentesis. The chi-squared test for trend was used to evaluate changes in nuchal translucency, chorionic villus sampling, and amniocentesis rates over six 6-month intervals. Maternal characteristics were compared with the use of Mann-Whitney U test and Fisher's exact test. Results: The 4029 women who met the inclusion criteria had a median age at delivery of 37 years (interquartile range, 36-39 years). The rates of nuchal translucency screening increased from 0% to 41.6% over the study interval. Women who underwent nuchal translucency screening when it was available were older than the women who did not (median age, 37 years [interquartile range, 36-40 years] vs median age, 37 years [interquartile range, 36-39 years]; P = .003). A higher proportion of women who were 40 years old underwent nuchal translucency screening when it was available than-did women who were 35 to 39 years old (24.9% vs 20.4%; P = .01). Women who underwent nuchal translucency screening were less likely to have chorionic villus sampling compared with women who did not undergo screening (1.9% vs 7.1%; P < .001). Rates of chorionic villus sampling declined over time, although amniocentesis rates remained unchanged. The overall rate of invasive testing declined. Different trends were noted in women who were 35 to 39 years old compared with women who were 40 years old. Conclusion: Higher rates of nuchal translucency screening were associated with lower rates of chorionic villus sampling and invasive testing. The addition of first-trimester screening may lead to reduced rates of invasive testing and fewer losses of normal pregnancies. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:769 / 774
页数:6
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   One-stop clinic for assessment of risk for trisomy 21 at 11-14 weeks: a prospective study of 15 030 pregnancies [J].
Bindra, R ;
Heath, V ;
Liao, A ;
Spencer, K ;
Nicolaides, KH .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 20 (03) :219-225
[2]   First-trimester screening for aneuploidy with fetal nuchal translucency in a United States population [J].
Chasen, ST ;
Sharma, G ;
Kalish, RB ;
Chervenak, FA .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 22 (02) :149-151
[3]  
Chasen ST, 2001, J ULTRAS MED, V20, P1147
[4]  
*COMM ED B AM COLL, 1996, ED B, V228
[5]   Genetic sonography - A cost-effective method for evaluating women 35 years and older who decline genetic amniocentesis [J].
DeVore, GR ;
Romero, R .
JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2002, 21 (01) :5-13
[6]   Efficacy of screening for fetal Down syndrome in the United States from 1974 to 1997 [J].
Egan, JFX ;
Benn, P ;
Borgida, AF ;
Rodis, JF ;
Campbell, WA ;
Vintzileos, AM .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 96 (06) :979-985
[7]   Second trimester screening for Down's syndrome using maternal serum dimeric inhibin A [J].
Haddow, JE ;
Palomaki, GE ;
Knight, GJ ;
Foster, DL ;
Neveux, LM .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 1998, 5 (03) :115-119
[8]   REDUCING THE NEED FOR AMNIOCENTESIS IN WOMEN 35 YEARS OF AGE OR OLDER WITH SERUM MARKERS FOR SCREENING [J].
HADDOW, JE ;
PALOMAKI, GE ;
KNIGHT, GJ ;
CUNNINGHAM, GC ;
LUSTIG, LS ;
BOYD, PA .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1994, 330 (16) :1114-1118
[9]   PRENATAL SCREENING FOR DOWNS-SYNDROME WITH USE OF MATERNAL SERUM MARKERS [J].
HADDOW, JE ;
PALOMAKI, GE ;
KNIGHT, GJ ;
WILLIAMS, J ;
PULKKINEN, A ;
CANICK, JA ;
SALLER, DN ;
BOWERS, GB .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1992, 327 (09) :588-593
[10]  
Kornman LH, 1997, PRENATAL DIAG, V17, P1011, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0223(199711)17:11<1011::AID-PD193>3.0.CO