Evaluation of the PillCam Colon capsule in the detection of colonic pathology: results of the first multicenter, prospective, comparative study

被引:288
作者
Eliakim, R.
Fireman, Z.
Gralnek, I. M.
Yassin, K.
Waterman, M.
Kopelman, Y.
Lachter, J.
Koslowsky, B.
Adler, S. N.
机构
[1] Rambam Med Ctr, Dept Med, IL-31096 Haifa, Israel
[2] Technion Israel Inst Technol, Rappaport Fac Med, Haifa, Israel
[3] Hillel Yaffe Med Ctr, Hadera, Israel
[4] Bikur Cholim Hosp, Jerusalem, Israel
关键词
D O I
10.1055/s-2006-944832
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and study aims: Population-based screening for colorectal cancer is widely recommended, with conventional colonoscopy considered to be the preferred diagnostic modality. However, compliance with screening colonoscopy is low and manpower capacity is limited. Capsule endoscopy might therefore represent a desirable alternative strategy. Patients and methods: The PillCam Colon capsule endoscope was prospectively tested in a multicenter setting. The indications for endoscopy in the enrolled patients included colorectal cancer screening (43%), postpolypectomy surveillance (26%), and lower gastrointestinal signs and symptoms (31%). Study subjects under-went colon preparation and then ingested the capsule on the morning of the examination, with conventional colonoscopy being performed the same day. The PillCam Colon capsule findings were reviewed by three experts in capsule endoscopy who were blinded to the conventional colonoscopy findings. Results: A total of 91 subjects were enrolled in three Israeli centers (55 men, 36 women; mean age 57), and the results were evaluable in 84 cases. The capsule was excreted within 10 hours in 74% of the patients and reached the rectosigmoid colon in the other 16%. Of the 84 evaluable patients, 20 (24%) had significant findings, defined as at least one polyp of 6 mm or more in size or three or more polyps of any size: 14/20 (70%) were identified with the capsule and 16/20 (80%) were identified by conventional colonoscopy. Polyps of any size were found in 45 patients, 34/ 45 (76%) found by the capsule and 36/45 (80%) by conventional colonoscopy. In comparison with conventional colonoscopy, false-positive findings on PillCam Colon capsule examination were recorded in 15/45 cases (33%). There were no adverse events related to the capsule endoscopy. Conclusions: PillCam Colon capsule endoscopy appears to be a promising new modality for colonic evaluation. Further improvements in the procedure will probably increase capsule examination completion and polyp detection rates. Additional studies are needed to evaluate the accuracy of PillCam Colon endoscopy in other patient populations with different prevalence levels of colonic disease.
引用
收藏
页码:963 / 970
页数:8
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
Bensen S, 1999, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V94, P194
[2]   Screening for colorectal cancer: Recommendation and rationale [J].
Berg, AO ;
Allan, JD ;
Frame, PS ;
Homer, CJ ;
Johnson, MS ;
Klein, JD ;
Lieu, TA ;
Mulrow, CD ;
Orleans, CT ;
Peipert, JF ;
Pender, NJ ;
Siu, AL ;
Teutsch, SM ;
Westhoff, C ;
Woolf, SH .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2002, 137 (02) :129-131
[3]   Use, appropriateness, and diagnostic yield of screening colonoscopy: an international observational study (EPAGE) [J].
Burnand, Bernard ;
Harris, Jennifer K. ;
Wietlisbach, Vincent ;
Froehlich, Florian ;
Vader, John-Paul ;
Gonvers, Jean-Jacques .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2006, 63 (07) :1018-1026
[4]   Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy) - A multicenter comparison with standard colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasia [J].
Cotton, PB ;
Durkalski, VL ;
Benoit, PC ;
Palesch, YY ;
Mauldin, PD ;
Hoffman, B ;
Vining, DJ ;
Small, WC ;
Affronti, J ;
Rex, D ;
Kopecky, KK ;
Ackerman, S ;
Burdick, JS ;
Brewington, C ;
Turner, MA ;
Zfass, A ;
Wright, AR ;
Iyer, RB ;
Lynch, P ;
Sivak, MV ;
Butler, H .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2004, 291 (14) :1713-1719
[5]   A simplified ingestion procedure for esophageal capsule endoscopy: initial evaluation in healthy volunteers [J].
Gralnek, I. M. ;
Rabinovitz, R. ;
Afik, D. ;
Eliakim, R. .
ENDOSCOPY, 2006, 38 (09) :913-918
[6]   A prospective, controlled assessment of factors influencing acceptance of screening colonoscopy [J].
Harewood, GC ;
Wiersema, MJ ;
Melton, LJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2002, 97 (12) :3186-3194
[7]   Colorectal cancer screening attitudes and behavior: A population-based study [J].
Janz, NK ;
Wren, PA ;
Schottenfeld, D ;
Guire, KE .
PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2003, 37 (06) :627-634
[8]   Are people being screened for colorectal cancer as recommended? Results from the National Health Interview Survey [J].
Nadel, MR ;
Blackman, DK ;
Shapiro, JA ;
Seeff, LC .
PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2002, 35 (03) :199-206
[9]   Location of adenomas missed by optical colonoscopy [J].
Pickhardt, PJ ;
Nugent, PA ;
Mysliwiec, PA ;
Choi, JR ;
Schindler, WR .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2004, 141 (05) :352-359
[10]   Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults [J].
Pickhardt, PJ ;
Choi, JR ;
Hwang, I ;
Butler, JA ;
Puckett, ML ;
Hildebrandt, HA ;
Wong, RK ;
Nugent, PA ;
Mysliwiec, PA ;
Schindler, WR .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2003, 349 (23) :2191-2200