Oral fluid testing for drugs of abuse:: Positive prevalence rates by Intercept™ immunoassay screening and GC-MS-MS confirmation and suggested cutoff concentrations

被引:83
作者
Cone, EJ
Presley, L
Lehrer, M
Seiter, W
Smith, M
Kardos, KW
Fritch, D
Salamone, S
Niedbala, RS
机构
[1] OraSure Technol Inc, Bethlehem, PA 18015 USA
[2] LabOne Inc, Lenexa, KS USA
[3] ConeChem Res LLC, Severna Pk, MD USA
关键词
D O I
10.1093/jat/26.8.541
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Draft guidelines for the use of oral fluid for workplace drug testing are under development by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) in cooperation with industry and researchers. Comparison studies of the effectiveness of oral fluid testing versus urine testing are needed to establish scientifically reliable cutoff concentrations for oral fluid testing. We present the results of the first large scale database on oral fluid testing in private industry. A total of 77,218 oral fluid specimens were tested over the period of January through October 2001 at LabOne. Specimens were screened by Intercept immunoassay at manufacturer's recommended cutoff concentrations for the five SAMHSA drug categories (marijuana, cocaine, opiates, phencyclidine, and amphetamines). Presumptive positive specimens were confirmed by gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. A total of 3908 positive tests were reported over the 10-month period, representing a positive rate of 5.06%. Of the five drug categories, marijuana and cocaine accounted for 85.75% of the positives. The pattern and frequency of drug positives showed remarkable similarity to urine drug prevalence rates reported for the general workforce according to the Quest Diagnostics' Drug Testing Index over the same general period, suggesting that oral fluid testing produces equivalent results to urine testing. The data on oral fluid testing also revealed a surprisingly high 66.7% prevalence of 6-acetylmorphine confirmations for morphine positives suggesting that oral fluid testing may be superior in some cases to urine testing. Comparison of oral fluid drug concentrations to SAMHSA-recommended cutoff concentrations in Draft Guidelines indicated that adoption of the screening and confirmation cutoff concentrations of Draft Guidelines #3 would produce the most consistent reporting results for all drug classes except amphetamines. Consequently, it is suggested that the final Guidelines adopt the screening and cutoff concentrations listed in Draft Guidelines #3 with the exception of lowering the amphetamines cutoff concentrations (screening/confirmation) to 50/50 ng/mL for amphetamine and methamphetamine.
引用
收藏
页码:541 / 546
页数:6
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]  
CONE EJ, 1991, J ANAL TOXICOL, V15, P1
[2]   The characterization of human urine for specimen validity determination in workplace drug testing: A review [J].
Cook, JD ;
Caplan, YH ;
LoDico, CP ;
Bush, DM .
JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL TOXICOLOGY, 2000, 24 (07) :579-588
[3]   Urinary excretion profiles of 11-nor-9-carboxy-Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol in humans after single smoked doses of marijuana [J].
Huestis, MA ;
Mitchell, JM ;
Cone, EJ .
JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL TOXICOLOGY, 1996, 20 (06) :441-452
[4]   COMPARISON OF HEROIN AND COCAINE CONCENTRATIONS IN SALIVA WITH CONCENTRATIONS IN BLOOD AND PLASMA [J].
JENKINS, AJ ;
OYLER, JM ;
CONE, EJ .
JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL TOXICOLOGY, 1995, 19 (06) :359-374
[5]   Detection of marijuana use by oral fluid and urine analysis following single-dose administration of smoked and oral marijuana [J].
Niedbala, RS ;
Kardos, KW ;
Fritch, DF ;
Kardos, S ;
Fries, T ;
Waga, J ;
Robb, J ;
Cone, EJ .
JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL TOXICOLOGY, 2001, 25 (05) :289-303
[6]   Laboratory analysis of remotely collected oral fluid specimens for opiates by immunoassay [J].
Niedbala, RS ;
Kardos, K ;
Waga, J ;
Fritch, D ;
Yeager, L ;
Doddamane, S ;
Schoener, E .
JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL TOXICOLOGY, 2001, 25 (05) :310-315
[7]  
Niedbala RS, 2001, J ANAL TOXICOL, V25, P62
[8]   SIMPLE AND RELIABLE SALIVARY TESTS FOR HIV AND HEPATITIS-A AND HEPATITIS-B VIRUS DIAGNOSIS AND SURVEILLANCE [J].
PARRY, JV .
ANNALS OF THE NEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES, 1993, 694 :216-233
[9]   Determination of five abused drugs in nitrite-adulterated urine by immunoassays and gas chromatography mass spectrometry [J].
Tsai, SCJ ;
ElSohly, MA ;
Dubrovsky, T ;
Twarowska, B ;
Towt, J ;
Salamone, SJ .
JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL TOXICOLOGY, 1998, 22 (06) :474-480
[10]   Nitrite adulteration of workplace urine drug-testing specimens I. Sources and associated concentrations of nitrite in urine and distinction between natural sources and adulteration [J].
Urry, FM ;
Komaromy-Hiller, G ;
Staley, B ;
Crockett, DK ;
Kushnir, M ;
Nelson, G ;
Struempler, RE .
JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL TOXICOLOGY, 1998, 22 (02) :89-95