Floral bud removal from specific fruiting positions in cotton: Yield and fiber quality

被引:20
作者
Heitholt, JJ
机构
[1] Cotton Physiology and Genetics, USDA-ARS, Stoneville, MS 38776
关键词
D O I
10.2135/cropsci1997.0011183X003700030022x
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Lint from cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) bells produced on proximal fruiting positions (FP) is often longer and more mature than lint from distal FP sites. The objective of this research was to quantify the effects of proximal or distal floral bud removal on yield, yield distribution, yield components, and fiber properties. Cotton (cv. Deltapine 5415) was grown in the field near Stoneville, B-IS, in 1993 and 1994. From first square to late bloom, young squares (floral buds) were removed from selected positions twice weekly. The most proximal FP was designated FP1, the second most proximal FP was designated FP2, etc. The three treatments were (i) check (no removal), (ii) P1 (FP2, FP3, and greater squares removed), and (iii) P2, (FP1 and FP3 and greater squares removed). Averaged across years, a greater percentage of bells (82 vs. 68%) and larger bells (1.61 vs. 1.50 g lint holl(-1)) were found at FP1 on the P1 treatment than on the check. A greater percentage of bells (42%) were found at FP2 on the P2 treatment, than in other treatments (10-24%). Lint yield (all bells) of the check (1090 kg ha(-1)) was 11 and 28% greater than the P1 and P2 treatment, respectively. In contrast to yield, composite fiber micronaire, maturity, and wall thickness were significantly greater (5-6%) in the P1 and P2 treatments than the check treatment. Fiber length and strength were unaffected by treatment. These results suggest that cotton may not be able to achieve its full yield potential if limited to one bell per main stem node. The increases In fiber properties were small and probably not economically important.
引用
收藏
页码:826 / 832
页数:7
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   MAPPING THE PRODUCTION AND SURVIVAL OF FRUIT ON FIELD-GROWN COTTON [J].
CONSTABLE, GA .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1991, 83 (02) :374-378
[2]   GROWTH, BOLL OPENING RATE, AND FIBER PROPERTIES OF NARROW-ROW COTTON [J].
HEITHOLT, JJ ;
PETTIGREW, WT ;
MEREDITH, WR .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1993, 85 (03) :590-594
[3]   COTTON BOLL RETENTION AND ITS RELATIONSHIP TO LINT YIELD [J].
HEITHOLT, JJ .
CROP SCIENCE, 1993, 33 (03) :486-490
[4]  
HEITHOLT JJ, 1994, CROP SCI, V34, P125, DOI [10.2135/cropsci1994.0011183X003400010022x, 10.2135/cropsci1994.0011183X003400050028x]
[5]   THIGMOMORPHOGENESIS - THE EFFECT OF MECHANICAL PERTURBATION ON PLANTS [J].
JAFFE, MJ ;
FORBES, S .
PLANT GROWTH REGULATION, 1993, 12 (03) :313-324
[6]   EFFECTIVENESS OF FRUITING SITES IN COTTON - YIELD [J].
JENKINS, JN ;
MCCARTY, JC ;
PARROTT, WL .
CROP SCIENCE, 1990, 30 (02) :365-369
[7]   Cotton response to seasonal patterns of flower removal .1. Yield and fiber quality [J].
Jones, MA ;
Wells, R ;
Guthrie, DS .
CROP SCIENCE, 1996, 36 (03) :633-638
[8]   Cotton response to seasonal patterns of flower removal .2. Growth and dry matter allocation [J].
Jones, MA ;
Wells, R ;
Guthrie, DS .
CROP SCIENCE, 1996, 36 (03) :639-645
[9]   EFFECT OF EARLY SEASON SQUARE REMOVAL ON 3 LEAF TYPES OF COTTON [J].
KENNEDY, CW ;
SMITH, WC ;
JONES, JE .
CROP SCIENCE, 1986, 26 (01) :139-145
[10]  
Kerby T. A., 1989, Proceedings of the 1989 Beltwide Cotton Production Research Conferences., P98