Gene expression in individual cells: analysis using global single cell reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (GSC RT-PCR)

被引:39
作者
Brail, LH
Jang, A
Billia, F
Iscove, NN
Klamut, HJ
Hill, RP
机构
[1] Princess Margaret Hosp, Ontario Canc Inst, Div Expt Therapeut, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Dept Med Biophys, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada
[3] Princess Margaret Hosp, Ontario Canc Inst, Div Cell & Mol Biol, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada
来源
MUTATION RESEARCH-GENOMICS | 1999年 / 406卷 / 2-4期
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
gene expression; cell; GSC RT-PCR;
D O I
10.1016/S1383-5726(98)00009-0
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
The determination of the gene expression pattern of single cells has important implications for many areas of cellular and developmental biology including lineage determination, identification of primitive stem cells and temporal gene expression patterns induced by changes in the cellular microenvironment, Global Single Cell Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction (GSC RT PCR) enables the study of single cell gene expression patterns. Initial observations of significant heterogeneity among single cells derived from a population of cells prompted us to determine how much of this observed heterogeneity was due to the intrinsic variation within the method. In this paper we discuss the sensitivity of GSC RT-PCR for analysis of differences in gene expression between single cells and. in particular, detail the amount of variation generated by the method itself. We found that most of the intrinsic variation in the method occurred in the PCR step. The total variation induced by the method was in the range of 5 fold. While we have determined that there is a five fold methodological variation in GSC RT-PCR, any method which use its components (including generation of cDNAs for microarray analysis) is likely to be affected by such experimental variability, which could limit the interpretation of the resulting data. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:45 / 54
页数:10
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] uPA, uPAR, PAI-I: key intersection of proteolytic, adhesive and chemotactic highways?
    Blasi, F
    [J]. IMMUNOLOGY TODAY, 1997, 18 (09): : 415 - 417
  • [2] BRADY G, 1990, Methods in Molecular and Cellular Biology, V2, P17
  • [3] p53-mediated radioresistance does not correlate with metastatic potential in tumorigenic rat embryo cell lines following oncogene transfection
    Bristow, RG
    Brail, L
    Jang, A
    Peacock, J
    Chung, S
    Benchimol, S
    Hill, RP
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1996, 34 (02): : 341 - 355
  • [4] COMPARISON BETWEEN INVITRO RADIOSENSITIVITY AND INVIVO RADIORESPONSE OF MURINE TUMOR-CELL LINES .1. PARAMETERS OF INVITRO RADIOSENSITIVITY AND ENDOGENOUS CELLULAR GLUTATHIONE LEVELS
    BRISTOW, RG
    HARDY, PA
    HILL, RP
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1990, 18 (01): : 133 - 145
  • [5] Temporal mapping of gene expression levels during the differentiation of individual primary hematopoietic cells
    Cheng, T
    Shen, HM
    Giokas, D
    Gere, J
    Tenen, DG
    Scadden, DT
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1996, 93 (23) : 13158 - 13163
  • [6] DeRisi J, 1996, NAT GENET, V14, P457
  • [7] Gene expression in normal and disease states - Identification of therapeutic targets
    Fannon, MR
    [J]. TRENDS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY, 1996, 14 (08) : 294 - 298
  • [8] A GENETIC MODEL FOR COLORECTAL TUMORIGENESIS
    FEARON, ER
    VOGELSTEIN, B
    [J]. CELL, 1990, 61 (05) : 759 - 767
  • [9] COMPARISON OF THE MOUSE L32 RIBOSOMAL-PROTEIN PROMOTER ELEMENTS IN MOUSE MYOBLASTS, FIBERS, AND L-CELLS
    HARRIS, SA
    DUDOV, KP
    BOWMAN, LH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CELLULAR BIOCHEMISTRY, 1992, 50 (02) : 178 - 189
  • [10] Accurate and absolute quantitative measurement of gene expression by single tube RT-PCR and HPLC
    HaywardLester, A
    Oefner, PJ
    Sabatini, S
    Doris, PA
    [J]. GENOME RESEARCH, 1995, 5 (05): : 494 - 499