Binocular rivalry and visual awareness: the role of attention

被引:156
作者
Ooi, TL
He, ZJJ
机构
[1] So Coll Optometry, Dept Biomed Sci, Memphis, TN 38104 USA
[2] Univ Louisville, Dept Psychol, Louisville, KY 40292 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1068/p2923
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
When the right eye and the left eye view dissimilar scenes, the observer does not experience a stable superimposed percept of the images presented to the two eyes, but instead perceives an alternation between the images seen by each eye. A critical question confronting this robust and intriguing phenomenon of binocular rivalry is how the visual system selects the image to be perceived (dominant). The current main-stream literature emphasizes a bottom-up explanation in which the rivalry stimulus with the higher contour strength has the advantage, and becomes dominant in rivalry. Nevertheless, some workers in the past have favored an attention-selection explanation for binocular rivalry. We investigated the role of attention in binocular rivalry by employing novel psychophysical paradigms which capitalized on several established phenomena (eg the Cheshire Cat effect, attention cueing, pop-out effect). Our results revealed two major aspects of attention modulation in binocular rivalry. We found that a dominant image is less likely to be suppressed when voluntary attention is directed to it. This suggests the role of voluntary attention in retaining the dominant image in visual awareness. Second, a rivalry stimulus is more likely to become dominant if accompanied by a pop-out cue (in the same eye and proximity). Since a pop-out cue attracts involuntary attention to its location/eye, this result suggests that cue-mediated involuntary attention can promote the ability of a rivalry stimulus to reach visual awareness.
引用
收藏
页码:551 / 574
页数:24
相关论文
共 75 条
[1]   SHIFTER CIRCUITS - A COMPUTATIONAL STRATEGY FOR DYNAMIC ASPECTS OF VISUAL PROCESSING [J].
ANDERSON, CH ;
VANESSEN, DC .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1987, 84 (17) :6297-6301
[2]   A NEURAL THEORY OF BINOCULAR-RIVALRY [J].
BLAKE, R .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1989, 96 (01) :145-167
[3]   SPATIAL ZONES OF BINOCULAR-RIVALRY IN CENTRAL AND PERIPHERAL-VISION [J].
BLAKE, R ;
OSHEA, RP ;
MUELLER, TJ .
VISUAL NEUROSCIENCE, 1992, 8 (05) :469-478
[4]   TEMPORAL PERTURBATIONS OF BINOCULAR-RIVALRY [J].
BLAKE, R ;
WESTENDORF, D ;
FOX, R .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1990, 48 (06) :593-602
[5]   Binocular rivalry and motion perception [J].
Blake, R ;
Yu, K ;
Lokey, M ;
Norman, H .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 1998, 10 (01) :46-60
[6]   THRESHOLD CONDITIONS FOR BINOCULAR-RIVALRY [J].
BLAKE, R .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1977, 3 (02) :251-257
[7]   DICHOPTIC READING - THE ROLE OF MEANING IN BINOCULAR-RIVALRY [J].
BLAKE, R .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1988, 44 (02) :133-141
[8]  
Breese B.B., 1899, PSYCHOL MONOGR, V3, pi, DOI DOI 10.1037/H0092990
[9]   Binocular rivalry [J].
Breese, BB .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1909, 16 (06) :410-415
[10]  
BURKHALTER A, 1986, J NEUROSCI, V6, P2327