Irradiance and phenotype:: comparative eco-development of sun and shade leaves in relation to photosynthetic CO2 diffusion

被引:386
作者
Terashima, I
Hanba, YT
Tazoe, Y
Vyas, P
Yano, S
机构
[1] Osaka Univ, Grad Sch Sci, Dept Biol, Toyonaka, Osaka 5600043, Japan
[2] Kyoto Inst Technol, Ctr Bioresource Field Sci, Ukyo Ku, Kyoto 6168354, Japan
关键词
aquaporin; cell wall; chloroplasts; conductance; diffusion; intercellular spaces; mechanical strength; photosynthesis; resistance to CO2 diffusion; stomata;
D O I
10.1093/jxb/erj014
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
The subject of this paper, sun leaves are thicker and show higher photosynthetic rates than the shade leaves, is approached in two ways. The first seeks to answer the question: why are sun leaves thicker than shade leaves? To do this, CO2 diffusion within a leaf is examined first. Because affinity of Rubisco for CO2 is low, the carboxylation of ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate is competitively inhibited by O-2, and the oxygenation of ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate leads to energy-consuming photorespiration, it is essential for C-3 plants to maintain the CO2 concentration in the chloroplast as high as possible. Since the internal conductance for CO2 diffusion from the intercellular space to the chloroplast stroma is finite and relatively small, C-3 leaves should have sufficient mesophyll surfaces occupied by chloroplasts to secure the area for CO2 dissolution and transport. This explains why sun leaves are thicker. The second approach is mechanistic or 'how-oriented'. Mechanisms are discussed as to how sun leaves become thicker than shade leaves, in particular, the long-distance signal transduction from mature leaves to leaf primordia inducing the periclinal division of the palisade tissue cells. To increase the mesophyll surface area, the leaf can either be thicker or have smaller cells. Issues of cell size are discussed to understand plasticity in leaf thickness.
引用
收藏
页码:343 / 354
页数:12
相关论文
共 77 条
[51]   EXOGENOUS INORGANIC CARBON SOURCES IN PLANT PHOTOSYNTHESIS [J].
RAVEN, JA .
BIOLOGICAL REVIEWS OF THE CAMBRIDGE PHILOSOPHICAL SOCIETY, 1970, 45 (02) :167-&
[52]  
RAVEN JA, 1981, PHYSL PROCESSES LIMI, P607
[53]  
Roy Harry, 2000, VVolume 9, P53
[54]   Is C4 photosynthesis less phenotypically plastic than C3 photosynthesis? [J].
Sage, RF ;
McKown, AD .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY, 2006, 57 (02) :303-317
[55]   The effect of light on membrane potential, apoplastic pH and cell expansion in leaves of Pisum sativum L. var. Argenteum. -: Role of the plasma-membrane H+-ATPase and photosynthesis [J].
Stahlberg, R ;
Van Volkenburgh, E .
PLANTA, 1999, 208 (02) :188-195
[56]   ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LEAF ANATOMY AND CO2 DIFFUSION THROUGH THE MESOPHYLL OF HYPOSTOMATOUS LEAVES [J].
SYVERTSEN, JP ;
LLOYD, J ;
MCCONCHIE, C ;
KRIEDEMANN, PE ;
FARQUHAR, GD .
PLANT CELL AND ENVIRONMENT, 1995, 18 (02) :149-157
[57]  
TAZOE Y, 2005, IN PRESS PLANT CELL, V28
[58]   Construction and maintenance of the optimal photosynthetic systems of the leaf, herbaceous plant and tree: an eco-developmental treatise [J].
Terashima, I ;
Araya, T ;
Miyazawa, S ;
Sone, K ;
Yano, S .
ANNALS OF BOTANY, 2005, 95 (03) :507-519
[59]   A NEW MODEL FOR LEAF PHOTOSYNTHESIS INCORPORATING THE GRADIENTS OF LIGHT ENVIRONMENT AND OF PHOTOSYNTHETIC PROPERTIES OF CHLOROPLASTS WITHIN A LEAF [J].
TERASHIMA, I ;
SAEKI, T .
ANNALS OF BOTANY, 1985, 56 (04) :489-499
[60]   COMPARATIVE ECOPHYSIOLOGY OF LEAF AND CANOPY PHOTOSYNTHESIS [J].
TERASHIMA, I ;
HIKOSAKA, K .
PLANT CELL AND ENVIRONMENT, 1995, 18 (10) :1111-1128