Assessing the Impact of Management Strategies on Water Use Efficiency Using Soil-Plant-Atmosphere Models

被引:27
作者
Basso, Bruno [1 ,2 ]
Ritchie, Joe T.
机构
[1] Michigan State Univ, Dept Geol Sci, E Lansing, MI 48823 USA
[2] Michigan State Univ, WK Kellogg Biol Stn, E Lansing, MI 48823 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
DRYLAND EVAPORATIVE FLUX; SUBHUMID CLIMATE; CROP; WHEAT; TRANSPIRATION; YIELD; FIELD; REDISTRIBUTION; NITROGEN; TILLAGE;
D O I
10.2136/vzj2011.0173
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Studies on water use efficiency (WUE) have primarily dealt with crops grown under water limited conditions and have usually not considered crop management factors other than irrigation. Improvements in crop management strategies, such as supplemental irrigation, proper fertilizer use, plant population and row-spacing, and new cultivars, attempt to minimize a crop exposure to soil water deficits. Under these circumstances, factors other than water supply can become limiting and production related to evaporation may not be a useful approach. Crop simulation models like CERES and SALUS have proven capability to provide reasonable estimates of each evaporation component as affected by management. Using simulated transpiration to estimate growth through transpiration efficiency, or simulated growth to estimate transpiration has major limitations when management influences yield and water supply is fixed or non-limiting. The microenvironment in sparse canopies strongly influences transpiration and soil evaporation due to large possible variations in sensible heat arising from variations in wetness of the soil surface. Crop growth is related to photosynthesis and plant development rates and is influenced primarily by intercepted photosynthetically active radiation whereas evaporation is influenced by a wider spectrum of energy. Factors related to management such as plant population and nutrient supply influences biomass production but has less influence on evaporation rates. Our analysis of published data and simulation studies indicates the use of simulated transpiration to estimate growth, or growth simulations to estimate transpiration is an unreasonable approach when management influences yield and water supply is fixed or not-limiting.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 43 条
[11]  
de Wit C.T., 1958, 64 AGR RES, V64
[12]   Measuring and modelling sell evaporation in wheat crops [J].
Denmead, OT ;
Dunin, FX ;
Leuning, R ;
Raupach, MR .
PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY OF THE EARTH, VOL 21, NO 3, MAY 1996: SOIL-VEGETATION-ATMOSPHERE TRANSFER AT DIFFERENT SCALES, 1996, 21 (03) :97-100
[13]  
Duvick D. N., 1984, Genetic contributions to yield gains of five major crop plants. Proceedings of a symposium sponsored by Division C-1 of the Crop Science Society of America, 2 December 1981, in Atlanta, Georgia, P15
[14]   Impact of manure and slurry applications on soil nitrate in a maize-triticale rotation: Field study and long term simulation analysis [J].
Giola, Pietro ;
Basso, Bruno ;
Pruneddu, Giovanni ;
Giunta, Francesco ;
Jones, James W. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 2012, 38 :43-53
[15]   DETERMINATION OF SOIL-WATER EVAPORATION AND TRANSPIRATION FROM ENERGY-BALANCE AND STEM-FLOW MEASUREMENTS [J].
HAM, JM ;
HEILMAN, JL ;
LASCANO, RJ .
AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 1990, 52 (3-4) :287-301
[16]   Simultaneous measurements of transpiration, soil evaporation and total evaporation in a maize field in northern Germany [J].
Herbst, M ;
Kappen, L ;
Thamm, F ;
Vanselow, R .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY, 1996, 47 (305) :1957-1962
[17]   The DSSAT cropping system model [J].
Jones, JW ;
Hoogenboom, G ;
Porter, CH ;
Boote, KJ ;
Batchelor, WD ;
Hunt, LA ;
Wilkens, PW ;
Singh, U ;
Gijsman, AJ ;
Ritchie, JT .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 2003, 18 (3-4) :235-265
[18]  
Marlatt W.E., 1961, 23 COL STAT U DEP AT
[19]   Managing yield and water use of pearl millet in the Sahel [J].
Payne, WA .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1997, 89 (03) :481-490
[20]   Assessing simple wheat and pea models using data from a long-term tillage experiment [J].
Payne, WA ;
Rasmussen, PE ;
Chen, CC ;
Ramig, RE .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2001, 93 (01) :250-260