Dual-retrieval processes in free and associative recall

被引:74
作者
Brainerd, CJ [1 ]
Wright, R
Reyna, VF
Payne, DG
机构
[1] Univ Arizona, Dept Special Educ, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
[2] SUNY Binghamton, Binghamton, NY USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
retrieval; free recalls; fuzzy-trace theory; reconstruction; memory judgment;
D O I
10.1006/jmla.2001.2796
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
Recent dual-retrieval accounts of free recall postulate that a memory target can be recalled either by directly accessing its verbatim trace or by reconstructing it from semantic or other relational information, We introduce a simple paradigm. derived from the classic Estes RTT procedure, that separates direct acess from reconstruction and that separates reconstruction front a metacognitive judgement process that authorizes reconstructed targets for output, Results are reported from four experiments, two that applied the paradigm to free recall and two that extended it to associative recall. The principal finding, were that (a) direct access was enhanced by manipulations that made targets' surface forms easier to process or that focused recall on individual targets. (b) reconstruction was enhanced by manipulations that made targets' meaning content easier to process or that focused recall on groups of targets, and (c) such manipulations produced single dislocations, double dissociations. and reversed associations between direct access, reconstruction, and metacognitive judgment. We discuss how this paradigm might be exploited to unify dual-retrieval conceptions of recall and recognition. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science.
引用
收藏
页码:120 / 152
页数:33
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]  
Ackerman B. P., 1985, BASIC PROCESSES MEMO, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-4613-9541-6_1
[2]   Theoretical and empirical review of multinomial process tree modeling [J].
Batchelder, WH ;
Riefer, DM .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 1999, 6 (01) :57-86
[3]   CATEGORY NORMS FOR VERBAL ITEMS IN 56 CATEGORIES - A REPLICATION AND EXTENSION OF CONNECTICUT CATEGORY NORMS [J].
BATTIG, WF ;
MONTAGUE, WE .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1969, 80 (3P2) :1-&
[4]   PRIORITY OF FREE-RECALL OF NEWLY LEARNED ITEMS [J].
BATTIG, WF ;
ALLEN, M ;
JENSEN, AR .
JOURNAL OF VERBAL LEARNING AND VERBAL BEHAVIOR, 1965, 4 (03) :175-179
[5]   FURTHER EVIDENCE THAT STRONGEST FREE-RECALLED ITEMS ARE NOT RECALLED FIRST [J].
BATTIG, WF .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 1965, 17 (03) :745-746
[6]   Evidence for a generate-recognize model of episodic influences on word-stem completion [J].
Bodner, GE ;
Masson, MEJ ;
Caldwell, JI .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2000, 26 (02) :267-293
[7]   IS RETRIEVABILITY GROUPING GOOD FOR RECALL [J].
BRAINERD, CJ ;
REYNA, VF ;
HARNISHFEGER, KK ;
HOWE, ML .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 1993, 122 (02) :249-268
[8]   Conjoint recognition [J].
Brainerd, CJ ;
Reyna, VF ;
Mojardin, AH .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1999, 106 (01) :160-179
[9]   ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF FORGETTING [J].
BRAINERD, CJ ;
KINGMA, J ;
HOWE, ML .
CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 1985, 56 (05) :1103-1119
[10]   AN IDENTIFIABLE MODEL OF 2-STAGE LEARNING [J].
BRAINERD, CJ ;
HOWE, ML ;
KINGMA, J .
JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1982, 26 (03) :263-293