Prognostic and predictive factors for patients with metastatic breast cancer undergoing aggressive induction therapy followed by high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem-cell support

被引:50
作者
Rizzieri, DA [1 ]
Vredenburgh, JJ [1 ]
Jones, R [1 ]
Ross, M [1 ]
Shpall, EJ [1 ]
Hussein, A [1 ]
Broadwater, G [1 ]
Berry, D [1 ]
Petros, WP [1 ]
Gilbert, C [1 ]
Affronti, ML [1 ]
Coniglio, D [1 ]
Rubin, P [1 ]
Elkordy, M [1 ]
Long, GD [1 ]
Chao, NJ [1 ]
Peters, WP [1 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Div Oncol & Bone Marrow Transplantat, Marrow & Stem Cell Transplantat Program, Durham, NC 27710 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.1999.17.10.3064
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: We performed a retrospective review to determine predictive and prognostic factors in patients with metastatic breast cancer who received induction therapy, and, if they responded to treatment, high-dose chemotherapy, Patients and Methods: Patients with metastatic breast cancer received induction therapy with doxorubicin, fluorouracil, and methotrexate (AFM). Partial responders then received immediate high-dose chemotherapy, whereas those who achieved complete remission were randomized to immediate or delayed high-dose chemotherapy with hematopoietic stem-cell support, We performed a retrospective review of data from these patients and used Cox proportional hazards regression models for analyses. Results: The overall response rate for the 425 patients enrolled was 74% (95% confidence interval, 70% to 78%). Multivariate analysis of data from all 425 patients revealed that positive estrogen receptor status (P = .0041), smaller metastatic foci (less than or equal to 2 v > 2 cm) (P = .0165), a longer disease-free interval from initial diagnosis to diagnosis of metastases (less than or equal to 2 v > 2 years) (P = .0051 ), and prior treatment with tamoxifen (P = .0152) were good prognostic signs for overall survival. Patients who had received prior adjuvant therapy (P = .0001) and those who developed liver metastases (P = .0001) had decreased rang-term survival. In the subgroup of responders to AFM induction, multivariate analysis showed that those with visceral metastases did less well (P = .0006), as did patients who had received prior adjuvant therapy (P = .0023), However, those who had received tamoxifen therapy in the adjuvant setting did better (P = .0143). Conclusion: The chance for long term remission with induction therapy with AFM and high-dose chemotherapy is increased for hormone receptor positive-patients with nonvisceral metastases who have not received prior adjuvant chemotherapy and have long disease-free intervals, (C) 1999 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
引用
收藏
页码:3064 / 3074
页数:11
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   High-dose chemotherapy with autologous hematopoietic stem-cell support for breast cancer in North America [J].
Antman, KH ;
Rowlings, PA ;
Vaughan, WP ;
Pelz, CJ ;
Fay, JW ;
Fields, KK ;
Freytes, CO ;
Gale, RP ;
Hillner, BE ;
Holland, HK ;
Kennedy, MJ ;
Klein, JP ;
Lazarus, HM ;
McCarthy, PL ;
Saez, R ;
Spitzer, G ;
Stadtmauer, EA ;
Williams, SF ;
Wolff, S ;
Sobocinski, KA ;
Armitage, JO ;
Horowitz, MM .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1997, 15 (05) :1870-1879
[2]   PROGNOSTIC FACTORS FOR PROLONGED PROGRESSION-FREE SURVIVAL WITH HIGH-DOSE CHEMOTHERAPY WITH AUTOLOGOUS STEM-CELL SUPPORT FOR ADVANCED BREAST-CANCER [J].
AYASH, LJ ;
WHEELER, C ;
FAIRCLOUGH, D ;
SCHWARTZ, G ;
REICH, E ;
WARREN, D ;
SCHNIPPER, L ;
ANTMAN, K ;
FREI, E ;
ELIAS, A .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1995, 13 (08) :2043-2049
[3]  
Berruti A, 1997, ANTICANCER RES, V17, P2763
[4]   RETRACTED: HIGH-DOSE CHEMOTHERAPY WITH HEMATOPOIETIC RESCUE AS PRIMARY-TREATMENT FOR METASTATIC BREAST-CANCER - A RANDOMIZED TRIAL (Retracted article. See vol. 19, pg. 2973, 2001) [J].
BEZWODA, WR ;
SEYMOUR, L ;
DANSEY, RD .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1995, 13 (10) :2483-2489
[5]  
BEZWODA WR, 1998, P AN M AM SOC CLIN, V17, pA115
[6]  
BOCIEK G, 1998, P AM SOC CLIN ONCOL, V17, pA114
[7]   Recent trends in US breast cancer incidence, survival, and mortality rates [J].
Chu, KC ;
Tarone, RE ;
Kessler, LG ;
Ries, LAG ;
Hankey, BF ;
Miller, BA ;
Edwards, BK .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1996, 88 (21) :1571-1579
[8]  
COX DR, 1972, J R STAT SOC B, V34, P187
[9]  
DAVIDOFF AM, 1991, CANCER RES, V51, P2605
[10]  
DUNPHY FR, 1994, CANCER, V73, P2157, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19940415)73:8<2157::AID-CNCR2820730821>3.0.CO