Improved AHP Method and Its Application in Risk Identification

被引:133
作者
Li, Fengwei [1 ]
Phoon, Kok Kwang [2 ]
Du, Xiuli [1 ]
Zhang, Mingju [1 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Univ Technol, Coll Architecture & Civil Engn, Beijing 100124, Peoples R China
[2] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Singapore 117576, Singapore
关键词
Risk identification; Analytic hierarchy process (AHP); Improved analytic hierarchy process; Construction management; Quantitative analysis; Statistical analysis; ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; CONSISTENCY; SAFETY; ALTERNATIVES; MODEL;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000605
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) approach has been widely used in multicriteria decision making (MCDM). It is very difficult to meet the consistency requirement of a comparison matrix (CM) in AHP. The authors analyze the reasons for inconsistent CM in AHP and propose an improved AHP (IAHP) to improve CM consistency by using a sorting and ranking methodology. The results of comparing AHP with IAHP by MATLAB simulation show that IAHP is more suitable for solving MCDM problems when the number of elements or factors is 5 or more in MCDM. A case study is presented to illustrate the performance of IAHP when applied to risk identification during an open-cut subway construction. The application results show that IAHP is superior to AHP in terms of CM consistency, information extraction effectiveness, and convenience in practical implementation. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000605. (C) 2013 American Society of Civil Engineers.
引用
收藏
页码:312 / 320
页数:9
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   The geometric consistency index:: Approximated thresholds [J].
Aguarón, J ;
Moreno-Jiménez, JM .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2003, 147 (01) :137-145
[2]  
Al-Subhi Al-Harbi K. M., 2001, International Journal of Project Management, V19, P19, DOI 10.1016/S0263-7863(99)00038-1
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1994, AHP SERIES
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1992, Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications
[5]  
[Anonymous], ANAL HIERARCHY PROCE
[6]  
ASTM, 1995, E1765 ASTM
[7]  
Bertolini M., INT J PROJ MANAG, V24, P422, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.IJPROMAN.2006.01.005
[8]   MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-ANALYSIS WITH FUZZY PAIRWISE COMPARISONS [J].
BOENDER, CGE ;
DEGRAAN, JG ;
LOOTSMA, FA .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1989, 29 (02) :133-143
[9]   Using AHP for determining priority in a safety management system [J].
Chan, AHS ;
Kwok, W ;
Duffy, VG .
INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT & DATA SYSTEMS, 2004, 104 (5-6) :430-445
[10]   Adapting aspects of GBTool 2005 - searching for suitability in Taiwan [J].
Chang, Kuei-Feng ;
Chiang, Che-Ming ;
Chou, Po-Cheng .
BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2007, 42 (01) :310-316