East Meets West? Board Characteristics in an Emerging Market: Evidence from Turkish Banks

被引:61
作者
Kaymak, Turhan [1 ]
Bektas, Eralp [2 ]
机构
[1] Eastern Mediterranean Univ, Business Dept, Fac Business & Econ, N Cyprus, Turkey
[2] Eastern Mediterranean Univ, Dept Banking & Finance, N Cyprus, Turkey
关键词
Corporate Governance; Board of Directors; Corporate Performance; Banking; Central and Eastern Europe;
D O I
10.1111/j.1467-8683.2008.00713.x
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Manuscript Type: Empirical Research Question/Issue: The aim of this study is to uncover whether prescribed "western style" governance practices surface in the characteristics of board of directors in Turkish banks, and to see if these characteristics influence firm performance. Turkey is an emerging market drawing large amounts of foreign investment but board composition issues have rarely been analyzed. Research Findings/Results: This study investigates the association of board independence, CEO duality, board size, and board tenure with bank performance in Turkey. These relationships are examined for all 27 Turkish banks operating in the market between the years 2001-2004. Our findings suggest that the presence of insiders has a positive impact on return on assets, while duality and board tenure are negatively associated with performance. Theoretical Implications: Our study shows that Turkish banks are following a number of recommended governance practices, but the prevalence of some arrangements may exacerbate principal-principal conflict. Whether this holds in other more closed sectors of the economy is an area worthy of further investigation. Practical Implications: The presence of duality in the form of duly empowered members/executive directors is very problematic, leading to potential principal-principal conflict. Strategic investors and portfolio managers should challenge this arrangement before making sizable outlays in the Turkish financial sector.
引用
收藏
页码:550 / 561
页数:12
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
Abdullah S., 2004, CORPORATE GOVERNANCE, V4, P47, DOI DOI 10.1108/14720700410558871
[2]  
Adams Rene., 2003, Economic Policy Review, V9, P123, DOI 10.2139/ssrn.387561.12
[3]  
Agoraki, 2007, EUROPEAN J LAW EC, V23, P1, DOI DOI 10.1007/s10657-007-9001-2
[4]  
ANDERSEN CA, 1986, NEW CORPORATE DIRECT
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1990, MANAGEMENT DEV COUNT
[6]   Human resource management in Turkey - Current issues and future challenges [J].
Aycan, Z .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANPOWER, 2001, 22 (03) :252-260
[7]  
Barnhart S., 1994, Managerial and Decision Economics, V15, P329, DOI 10.1002/mde.4090150407
[8]  
BAYSINGER BD, 1985, J LAW ECON ORGAN, V1, P101
[9]   The persistence of profits in the Turkish banking system [J].
Bektas, Eralp .
APPLIED ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2007, 14 (03) :187-190
[10]  
BELKHIR M, 2009, INT J MANAG IN PRESS, V5