White cell reduction during plateletpheresis:: a comparison of three blood cell separators

被引:35
作者
Moog, R [1 ]
Müller, N [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Essen Gesamthsch, Inst Transfus Med, D-45122 Essen, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1046/j.1537-2995.1999.39060572.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: White cell (WBC)-reduced single-donor platelet concentrates (SDPs) can be collected by the newest generation of blood cell separators. Three WBC-reduction techniques during plateletpheresis were investigated in the present study with respect to WBC content and platelet yield. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The Amicus device used the elutriation principle for WBC reduction, and separations with periodically alternating interface position (PAIP) were employed in the AS.TEC 204. WBC reduction by in-line filtration was performed in the MCS+. Platelets were measured electronically and WBCs were determined manually (Nageotte chamber). RESULTS: In-line filtered SDPs showed significantly lower WBC content (0.088 +/- 0.178 x 10(6)) than SDPs that were WBC: reduced by elutriation (0.31 +/- 0.48 x 10(6)) or PAIP technique (0.89 +/- 1.57 x 10(6), p = 0.0001). Platelet yield (5.0 +/- 0.46 x 10(11)) was significantly higher in components obtained with the Amicus device (p = 0.0001). The AS.TEC 204 and MCS+ gave similar results for platelet yields: 3.15 +/- 0.63 and 3.28 +/- 0.71 x 10(11), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The plateletpheresis systems studied allow the collection of WBC-reduced SDPs. In-line filtration resulted in the best WBC reduction. Some SDPs collected with the devices studied had a WBC content >1 x 106 per unit. Platelet yield was significantly higher in SDPs from the Amicus device.
引用
收藏
页码:572 / 577
页数:6
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
ANDREU G, 1988, BLOOD, V72, P964
[2]   EFFECT OF FILTRATION OF PLATELET CONCENTRATES ON THE ACCUMULATION OF CYTOKINES AND PLATELET-RELEASE FACTORS DURING STORAGE [J].
AYE, MT ;
PALMER, DS ;
GIULIVI, A ;
HASHEMI, S .
TRANSFUSION, 1995, 35 (02) :117-124
[3]  
BOCK M, 1991, INFUSIONSTHERAPIE, V18, P30
[4]   A COMPARISON OF FILTERED LEUKOCYTE-REDUCED AND CYTOMEGALOVIRUS (CMV) SERONEGATIVE BLOOD PRODUCTS FOR THE PREVENTION OF TRANSFUSION-ASSOCIATED CMV INFECTION AFTER MARROW TRANSPLANT [J].
BOWDEN, RA ;
SLICHTER, SJ ;
SAYERS, M ;
WEISDORF, D ;
CAYS, M ;
SCHOCH, G ;
BANAJI, M ;
HAAKE, R ;
WELK, K ;
FISHER, L ;
MCCULLOUGH, J ;
MILLER, W .
BLOOD, 1995, 86 (09) :3598-3603
[5]  
BOWDEN RA, 1991, BLOOD, V78, P246
[6]  
BROBERG H, 1994, INFUSIONSTHER TRANSF, V21, P222
[7]  
Burgstaler EA, 1997, J CLIN APHERESIS, V12, P55, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1098-1101(1997)12:2<55::AID-JCA1>3.0.CO
[8]  
2-8
[9]  
Council of Europe, 1997, GUID PREP US QUAL AS
[10]  
DEGRAANHENTZEN YCE, 1989, TRANSFUSION, V29, P757