Practical implementation of cost-effective genomic selection in commercial pig breeding using imputation

被引:83
作者
Cleveland, M. A. [1 ]
Hickey, J. M. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Genus Plc, Hendersonville, TN 37075 USA
[2] Univ New England, Sch Environm & Rural Sci, Armidale, NSW, Australia
[3] Int Maize & Wheat Improvement Ctr CIMMYT, Biometr & Stat Unit, Mexico City 06600, DF, Mexico
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
accuracy; genomic breeding values; genomic selection; imputation; pig; single nucleotide polymorphism; GENETIC-RELATIONSHIP INFORMATION; DENSITY MARKER PANELS; GENOTYPE IMPUTATION; HOLSTEIN CATTLE; ACCURACY; VALUES; POPULATIONS; IMPACT; PREDICTION; PEDIGREE;
D O I
10.2527/jas.2013-6270
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Genomic selection can be implemented in pig breeding at a reduced cost using genotype imputation. Accuracy of imputation and the impact on resulting genomic breeding values (gEBV) was investigated. High-density genotype data was available for 4,763 animals from a single pig line. Three low-density genotype panels were constructed with SNP densities of 450 (L450), 3,071 (L3k) and 5,963 (L6k). Accuracy of imputation was determined using 184 test individuals with no genotyped descendants in the data but with parents and grandparents genotyped using the Illumina PorcineSNP60 Beadchip. Alternative genotyping scenarios were created in which parents, grandparents, and individuals that were not direct ancestors of test animals (Other) were genotyped at high density (S1), grandparents were not genotyped (S2), dams and granddams were not genotyped (S3), and dams and granddams were genotyped at low density (S4). Four additional scenarios were created by excluding Other animal genotypes. Test individuals were always genotyped at low density. Imputation was performed with AlphaImpute. Genomic breeding values were calculated using the single-step genomic evaluation. Test animals were evaluated for the information retained in the gEBV, calculated as the correlation between gEBV using imputed genotypes and gEBV using true genotypes. Accuracy of imputation was high for all scenarios but decreased with fewer SNP on the low-density panel (0.995 to 0.965 for S1) and with reduced genotyping of ancestors, where the largest changes were for L450 (0.965 in S1 to 0.914 in S3). Exclusion of genotypes for Other animals resulted in only small accuracy decreases. Imputation accuracy was not consistent across the genome. Information retained in the gEBV was related to genotyping scenario and thus to imputation accuracy. Reducing the number of SNP on the low-density panel reduced the information retained in the gEBV, with the largest decrease observed from L3k to L450. Excluding Other animal genotypes had little impact on imputation accuracy but caused large decreases in the information retained in the gEBV. These results indicate that accuracy of gEBV from imputed genotypes depends on the level of genotyping in close relatives and the size of the genotyped dataset. Fewer high-density genotyped individuals are needed to obtain accurate imputation than are needed to obtain accurate gEBV. Strategies to optimize development of low-density panels can improve both imputation and gEBV accuracy.
引用
收藏
页码:3583 / 3592
页数:10
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Hot topic: A unified approach to utilize phenotypic, full pedigree, and genomic information for genetic evaluation of Holstein final score [J].
Aguilar, I. ;
Misztal, I. ;
Johnson, D. L. ;
Legarra, A. ;
Tsuruta, S. ;
Lawlor, T. J. .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2010, 93 (02) :743-752
[2]   Genome-wide marker-assisted selection combining all pedigree phenotypic information with genotypic data in one step: An example using broiler chickens [J].
Chen, C. Y. ;
Misztal, I. ;
Aguilar, I. ;
Tsuruta, S. ;
Meuwissen, T. H. E. ;
Aggrey, S. E. ;
Wing, T. ;
Muir, W. M. .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2011, 89 (01) :23-28
[3]   The importance of information on relatives for the prediction of genomic breeding values and the implications for the makeup of reference data sets in livestock breeding schemes [J].
Clark, Samuel A. ;
Hickey, John M. ;
Daetwyler, Hans D. ;
van der Werf, Julius H. J. .
GENETICS SELECTION EVOLUTION, 2012, 44 :4
[4]   A Common Dataset for Genomic Analysis of Livestock Populations [J].
Cleveland, Matthew A. ;
Hickey, John M. ;
Forni, Selma .
G3-GENES GENOMES GENETICS, 2012, 2 (04) :429-435
[5]  
Deeb N., 2012, INT PLANT AN GEN 20
[6]   The nature, scope and impact of genomic prediction in beef cattle in the United States [J].
Garrick, Dorian J. .
GENETICS SELECTION EVOLUTION, 2011, 43
[7]   The impact of genetic relationship information on genome-assisted breeding values [J].
Habier, D. ;
Fernando, R. L. ;
Dekkers, J. C. M. .
GENETICS, 2007, 177 (04) :2389-2397
[8]   Genomic Selection Using Low-Density Marker Panels [J].
Habier, D. ;
Fernando, R. L. ;
Dekkers, J. C. M. .
GENETICS, 2009, 182 (01) :343-353
[9]   The impact of genetic relationship information on genomic breeding values in German Holstein cattle [J].
Habier, David ;
Tetens, Jens ;
Seefried, Franz-Reinhold ;
Lichtner, Peter ;
Thaller, Georg .
GENETICS SELECTION EVOLUTION, 2010, 42
[10]   Accuracy of genotype imputation in sheep breeds [J].
Hayes, B. J. ;
Bowman, P. J. ;
Daetwyler, H. D. ;
Kijas, J. W. ;
van der Werf, J. H. J. .
ANIMAL GENETICS, 2012, 43 (01) :72-80