Extending the Theory of Goal Ambiguity to Programs: Examining the Relationship between Goal Ambiguity and Performance

被引:42
作者
Jung, Chan Su [1 ]
机构
[1] City Univ Hong Kong, Dept Publ Policy, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
PUBLIC MANAGEMENT; ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE; EMPIRICAL-ASSESSMENT; GONE WILD; PART; MOTIVATION; POLITICS; GOVERNMENT; AGENCIES; BENEFITS;
D O I
10.1111/puar.12176
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;
摘要
One of the main assumptions of empirical studies conducted on the influence of goal ambiguity in public management is that goal ambiguity relates negatively to performance. However, this relationship has rarely been tested at the program level because common goal ambiguity and performance measures for disparate government programs have been scant. The availability of Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART) results for a number of federal programs provides the opportunity for an analysis testing the foregoing assumption. Measures of program goal ambiguity-target, timeline, and program evaluation-are shown to have negative relationships with different program performance scores, taking into account alternative influences or biases on performance. This analysis extends the theory of goal ambiguity by providing the first analysis of large-sample federal programs. The theoretical and practical implications are presented in the discussion and conclusion.
引用
收藏
页码:205 / 219
页数:15
相关论文
共 95 条
[1]  
Allison G., 1983, Public Management, P72
[2]   Strategy content and organizational performance: An empirical analysis [J].
Andrews, R ;
Boyne, GA ;
Walker, RM .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2006, 66 (01) :52-63
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2005, INT C HARM ICH TECHN
[4]  
[Anonymous], FY 2004 BUDG CHAPT I
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2010, OXFORD HDB AM BUREAU
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1980, MEASURING ASSESSING
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2013, RED SERIES TOBACCO P, DOI DOI 10.1093/J0PART/MUT020
[8]  
[Anonymous], GUID COMPL 2006 PART
[9]  
[Anonymous], POLITIQUES MANAGEMEN
[10]  
Bandura A., 1989, GOAL CONCEPTS PERSON, P19