Extending the Theory of Goal Ambiguity to Programs: Examining the Relationship between Goal Ambiguity and Performance

被引:42
作者
Jung, Chan Su [1 ]
机构
[1] City Univ Hong Kong, Dept Publ Policy, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
PUBLIC MANAGEMENT; ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE; EMPIRICAL-ASSESSMENT; GONE WILD; PART; MOTIVATION; POLITICS; GOVERNMENT; AGENCIES; BENEFITS;
D O I
10.1111/puar.12176
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;
摘要
One of the main assumptions of empirical studies conducted on the influence of goal ambiguity in public management is that goal ambiguity relates negatively to performance. However, this relationship has rarely been tested at the program level because common goal ambiguity and performance measures for disparate government programs have been scant. The availability of Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART) results for a number of federal programs provides the opportunity for an analysis testing the foregoing assumption. Measures of program goal ambiguity-target, timeline, and program evaluation-are shown to have negative relationships with different program performance scores, taking into account alternative influences or biases on performance. This analysis extends the theory of goal ambiguity by providing the first analysis of large-sample federal programs. The theoretical and practical implications are presented in the discussion and conclusion.
引用
收藏
页码:205 / 219
页数:15
相关论文
共 95 条
[31]   The Role of Psychological Climate on Public Sector Employees' Organizational Commitment: An Empirical Assessment for Three Occupational Groups [J].
Hassan, Shahidul ;
Rohrbaugh, John .
INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2011, 14 (01) :27-62
[32]   Content validity in psychological assessment: A functional approach to concepts and methods [J].
Haynes, SN ;
Richard, DCS ;
Kubany, ES .
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 1995, 7 (03) :238-247
[33]  
Heinrich C.J., 2003, HDB PUBLIC ADM, P25, DOI DOI 10.4135/9781848608214.N3
[34]   False or fitting recognition? The use of high performance bonuses in motivating organizational achievements [J].
Heinrich, Carolyn J. .
JOURNAL OF POLICY ANALYSIS AND MANAGEMENT, 2007, 26 (02) :281-304
[35]   How Credible Is the Evidence, and Does It Matter? An Analysis of the Program Assessment Rating Tool [J].
Heinrich, Carolyn J. .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2012, 72 (01) :123-134
[36]  
Heinrich CarolynJ., 1999, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, V9, P363, DOI DOI 10.1093/OXFORDJOURNALS.JPART.A024415
[37]   Rational management, performance targets and executive agencies: Views from agency chief executives in Northern Ireland [J].
Hyndman, N ;
Eden, R .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2001, 79 (03) :579-598
[38]  
Hyndman N., 2000, MANAGE ACCOUNT RES, V11, P175, DOI DOI 10.1006/MARE.2000.0127
[39]   Why Are Goals Important in the Public Sector? Exploring the Benefits of Goal Clarity for Reducing Turnover Intention [J].
Jung, Chan Su .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION RESEARCH AND THEORY, 2014, 24 (01) :209-234
[40]   Navigating a Rough Terrain of Public Management: Examining the Relationship between Organizational Size and Effectiveness [J].
Jung, Chan Su .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION RESEARCH AND THEORY, 2013, 23 (03) :663-686