Patients' and physicians' evaluation of the PHQ-D for depression screening

被引:11
作者
Bermejo, Isaac [1 ]
Niebling, Wilhelm [1 ]
Mathias, Berger [1 ]
Haerter, Martin [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Freiburg, Dept Psychiat & Psychotherapy, Sect Clin Epidemiol & Hlth Serv, D-79104 Freiburg, Germany
关键词
depression; screening; primary care; screening evaluation; detection rate;
D O I
10.1185/135525706X75285
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background:. A high number of patients in primary care suffer from depressive disorders. General practitioners (GPs) have an important function in detecting depression at an early stage. There is evidence that the detection of depressive disorders can be optimised by implementing routine screening. Aim: To analyse the acceptability of the PHQ-D as screening tool for depressive disorders in primary care. Design/Setting. Feasibility study in general practices in South Baden (Germany) Methods: 1034 patients of 17 GPs in single practices were screened with the Patient Health Questionnaire and asked to evaluate the screening tool in terms of its acceptability for routine practice. The GPs assessed the complaints and diagnoses of each patient and also evaluated the screening tool in terms of its practicability for daily care. Results: GPs and patients evaluate the screening questionnaire differently, with patients rating the usefulness of the instrument more positively. 50.0% of the GPs rated it as an impediment, whereas 75.8% of the patients evaluated it as feasible for routine. No differences were found between patients with and without depressive symptoms. Conclusion: Patients accept the PHQ-D for assessing depressive symptoms in primary care. The GPs' belief that patients would not accept such questionnaires proved not to be in accordance with the patients' evaluation. More detailed analyses are needed to evaluate the efficiency of the PHQ-D for routine care.
引用
收藏
页码:125 / 131
页数:7
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [11] Psychiatric screening in primary care: What do patients really want?
    Lish, JD
    Kuzma, MA
    Lush, DT
    Plescia, G
    Farber, NJ
    Zimmerman, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH, 1997, 42 (02) : 167 - 175
  • [12] Preferences of patients for patient centred approach to consultation in primary care: observational study
    Little, P
    Everitt, H
    Williamson, I
    Warner, G
    Moore, M
    Gould, C
    Ferrier, K
    Payne, S
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2001, 322 (7284): : 468 - 472
  • [13] LOMBARDO R, 2002, THESIS U FREIBURG
  • [14] Comparative validity of three screening questionnaires for DSM-IV depressive disorders and physicians' diagnoses
    Löwe, B
    Spitzer, RL
    Gräfe, K
    Kroenke, K
    Quenter, A
    Zipfel, S
    Buchholz, C
    Witte, S
    Herzog, W
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2004, 78 (02) : 131 - 140
  • [15] Lowe B., 2001, Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-D)
  • [16] Nease DE, 2003, J FAM PRACTICE, V52, P118
  • [17] Screening for depression in medical care - Pitfalls, alternatives, and revised priorities
    Palmer, SC
    Coyne, JC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH, 2003, 54 (04) : 279 - 287
  • [18] Screening for depression in adults: A summary of the evidence for the US Preventive Services Task Force
    Pignone, MP
    Gaynes, BN
    Rushton, JL
    Burchell, CM
    Orleans, CT
    Mulrow, CD
    Lohr, KN
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2002, 136 (10) : 765 - 776
  • [19] Simon G E, 1995, Arch Fam Med, V4, P99, DOI 10.1001/archfami.4.2.99
  • [20] SIRIWARDENA AN, 1995, BRIT J GEN PRACT, V45, P643