Volumetric breast density estimation from full-field digital mammograms

被引:189
作者
van Engeland, S [1 ]
Snoeren, PR [1 ]
Huisman, H [1 ]
Boetes, C [1 ]
Karssemeijer, N [1 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, NL-6525 GA Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
full-field digital mammograms; mammography; MRI; physical model of image acquisition; validation; volumetric breast density;
D O I
10.1109/TMI.2005.862741
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
A method is presented for estimation of dense breast tissue volume from mammograms obtained with full-field digital mammography (FFDM). The thickness of dense tissue mapping to a pixel is determined by using a physical model of image acquisition. This model is based on the assumption that the breast is composed of two types of tissue, fat and parenchyma. Effective linear attenuation coefficients of these tissues are derived from empirical data as a function of tube voltage (kVp), anode material, filtration, and compressed breast thickness. By employing these, tissue composition at a given pixel is computed after performing breast thickness compensation, using a reference value for fatty tissue determined by the maximum pixel value in the breast tissue projection. Validation has been performed using 22 FFDM cases acquired with a GE Senographe 2000D by comparing the volume estimates with volumes obtained by semi-automatic segmentation of breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data. The correlation between MRI and mammography volumes was 0.94 on a per image basis and 0.97 on a per patient basis. Using the dense tissue volumes from NIRI data as the gold standard, the average relative error of the volume estimates was 13.6%.
引用
收藏
页码:273 / 282
页数:10
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   Density correction of peripheral breast tissue on digital mammograms [J].
Bick, U ;
Giger, ML ;
Schmidt, RA ;
Nishikawa, RM ;
Doi, K .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 1996, 16 (06) :1403-1411
[2]   Molybdenum, rhodium, and tungsten anode spectral models using interpolating polynomials with application to mammography [J].
Boone, JM ;
Fewell, TR ;
Jennings, RJ .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1997, 24 (12) :1863-1874
[3]   DISTANCE TRANSFORMATIONS IN DIGITAL IMAGES [J].
BORGEFORS, G .
COMPUTER VISION GRAPHICS AND IMAGE PROCESSING, 1986, 34 (03) :344-371
[4]   On the noise variance of a digital mammography system [J].
Burgess, A .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2004, 31 (07) :1987-1995
[5]   Thickness-equalization processing for mammographic images [J].
Byng, JW ;
Critten, JP ;
Yaffe, MJ .
RADIOLOGY, 1997, 203 (02) :564-568
[6]   X-ray characterization of breast phantom materials [J].
Byng, JW ;
Mainprize, JG ;
Yaffe, MJ .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1998, 43 (05) :1367-1377
[7]   THE QUANTITATIVE-ANALYSIS OF MAMMOGRAPHIC DENSITIES [J].
BYNG, JW ;
BOYD, NF ;
FISHELL, E ;
JONG, RA ;
YAFFE, MJ .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1994, 39 (10) :1629-1638
[8]   Analysis of mammographic density and breast cancer risk from digitized mammograms [J].
Byng, JW ;
Yaffe, MJ ;
Jong, RA ;
Shumak, RS ;
Lockwood, GA ;
Tritchler, DL ;
Boyd, NF .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 1998, 18 (06) :1587-1598
[9]   MAMMOGRAPHIC FEATURES AND BREAST-CANCER RISK - EFFECTS WITH TIME, AGE, AND MENOPAUSE STATUS [J].
BYRNE, C ;
SCHAIRER, C ;
WOLFE, J ;
PAREKH, N ;
SALANE, M ;
BRINTON, LA ;
HOOVER, R ;
HAILE, R .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1995, 87 (21) :1622-1629
[10]   CHARACTERIZATION OF MAMMOGRAPHIC PARENCHYMAL PATTERN BY FRACTAL DIMENSION [J].
CALDWELL, CB ;
STAPLETON, SJ ;
HOLDSWORTH, DW ;
JONG, RA ;
WEISER, WJ ;
COOKE, G ;
YAFFE, MJ .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1990, 35 (02) :235-247