Orthogonal Pin Construct Versus Parallel Uniplanar Pin Constructs for Pelvic External Fixation: A Biomechanical Assessment of Stiffness and Strength

被引:17
作者
Archdeacon, Michael T. [1 ]
Arebi, Sameh [1 ]
Le, T. Toan [1 ]
Wirth, Rene [2 ]
Kebel, Roland [2 ]
Thakore, Mayur [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cincinnati, Coll Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Cincinnati, OH 45267 USA
[2] Stryker Osteosynth, Mahwah, NJ USA
关键词
external fixation; orthogonal pin; pelvic fracture; supra-acetabular; vertical instability; MECHANICAL VALIDATION; SKELETAL FIXATION; FRACTURES; RING; STABILIZATION; PLACEMENT; INJURIES; FIXATORS; ANTERIOR; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181962e0e
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
100224 [整形外科学];
摘要
Objective: The purpose of this study is to compare the structural stiffness of an orthogonal pelvic external fixator pin construct with 2 different parallel external fixator pin constructs in a simulated bone model. Hypothesis: An orthogonal pelvic external fixator pin construct would be significantly more stiff than a parallel pin construct when loaded in-plane under similar conditions. Design: Thirty synthetic pelvic bone models were configured with orthogonal pins (group 1), parallel iliac crest pins (group 2), or parallel supra-acetabular pins (group 3). Specimens were loaded either in-plane (flexion/extension moment) or out-of-plane (internal/external rotation moment) to assess construct stiffness. Setting: Orthopaedic industry mechanical testing laboratory (Stryker Orthopedics, Mahwah, NJ). Intervention: Single load cycle to failure with load application modified to assess stiffness both in-plane and out-of-plane with the pin constructs. Main Outcome Measure: Pelvic external fixation pin construct stiffness. Results: Stiffness for in-plane loading was 150.2 +/- 51.2 N/mm for the orthogonal pin construct, 105.0 +/- 46.9 N/mm for the iliac crest pin construct, and 104.7 +/- 20.7 N/mm for the supra-acetabular pin construct. Pairwise comparisons demonstrated that the difference was significant (P < 0.05) between groups 1 and 2 and groups 1 and 3 but not between groups 2 and 3. Stiffness for out-of-plane loading was 49.6 +/- 3.4 N/mm for the orthogonal pin construct, 53.9 +/- 3.5 N/mm for the iliac crest pin construct, and 100.6 +/- 4.3 N/mm for the supra-acetabular pin construct, with significant differences (P < 0.05) between groups 1 and 3 and groups 2 and 3 but not between groups 1 and 2. Conclusion: An orthogonal pelvic external fixator pin construct produced a significantly stiffer construct for in-plane loading (flexion/extension moment) compared with either parallel pin construct; however, a parallel supra-acetabular pin construct was stiffer for out-of-plane loading.
引用
收藏
页码:100 / 105
页数:6
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]
Distraction external fixation in lateral compression pelvic fractures [J].
Bellabarba, C ;
Ricci, WM ;
Bolhofner, BR .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2000, 14 (07) :475-482
[2]
Bircher M D, 1996, Injury, V27 Suppl 2, pB3
[3]
Mechanical validation of whole bone composite femur models [J].
Cristofolini, L ;
Viceconti, M ;
Cappello, A ;
Toni, A .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1996, 29 (04) :525-535
[4]
Mechanical validation of whole bone composite tibia models [J].
Cristofolini, L ;
Viceconti, M .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2000, 33 (03) :279-288
[5]
A STUDY OF EXTERNAL SKELETAL FIXATION SYSTEMS FOR UNSTABLE PELVIC FRACTURES [J].
DAHNERS, LE ;
JACOBS, RR ;
JAYARAMAN, G ;
CEPULO, AJ .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 1984, 24 (10) :876-881
[6]
Der einfache supraazetabuläre Fixateur externe für die Behandlung von BeckenfrakturenSupraacetabular External Fixation for Pelvic Ring Fractures [J].
Axel Gänsslen ;
Tim Pohlemann ;
Christian Krettek .
Operative Orthopädie und Traumatologie, 2005, 17 (3) :296-312
[7]
Stabilization of unstable pelvic fractures with supraacetabular compression external fixation [J].
Gardner, Michael J. ;
Nork, Sean E. .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2007, 21 (04) :269-273
[8]
GHANAYEM AJ, 1995, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P75
[9]
Placement of half-pins for supra-acetabular external fixation: An anatomic study [J].
Haidukewych, GJ ;
Kumar, S ;
Prpa, B .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2003, (411) :269-273
[10]
Structural properties of a new design of composite replicate femurs and tibias [J].
Heiner, AD ;
Brown, TD .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2001, 34 (06) :773-781